M. Damm
To Win
S. Purtseladze
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W WForm
L L W L W L L W W LThey have played 5 sets in total, with Purtseladze winning 4 and Sobhy winning 1. The last match between Purtseladze and Sobhy was at the M25 Sharm ElSheikh, 16-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Saba Purtseladze getting the victory 6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Saba Purtseladze | 2 |
Michael Bassem Sobhy | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Sharm ElSheikh(16-04-2025)
Purtseladze | Stats | Sobhy |
---|---|---|
82% (41-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (7-9) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
288 | Ranking | 850 |
288 | Highest Rank | 850 |
23 | Age | 21 |
- | Plays | - |
10 | Titles | 0 |
55% (196-158) | Career Total W/L | 42% (76-103) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
5 | YTD Titles | 0 |
2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
15 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
17 May 2025 / Final
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5) |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
57%
(
72 of
127)
1st Serve %
59%
(
80 of
135)
20
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
40%
(
22 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
49 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
55 of
135)
133
Total Points Won
129
|
||||
6-2 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
33%
(
18 of
54)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 1 |
32 | Games Won | 24 |
30 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
2:19:57 | Average Match Time | 2:19:57 |
58% (113/196) | 1st Serve % | 52% (98/189) |
76% (86/113) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (64/98) |
45% (37/83) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (47/91) |
41% (7/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 23% (3/13) |
41% (78/189) | Return Points Win % | 37% (73/196) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In the thrilling world of tennis, second serve performance often holds secrets to a player's success. Over the last six months, Sobhy has clinched 46.55% of points on his second serve, slightly edging out Purtseladze, who has secured 45.5%. How telling are these numbers for predicting the match outcome between these two? A dive into their return game stats might provide more clarity.
Examining the recent return game statistics, Sobhy has captured 46.1% of his opponent's second serve points, surpassing Purtseladze who managed 44.86%. The disparity widens on first serve returns, with Sobhy leading at 27.04% compared to Purtseladze's 21.5%. These numbers hint at Sobhy having the upper hand in pressurizing Purtseladze's serve. But who prevails under extreme pressure, which is crucial in tight matches?
An analysis of their ability to save breakpoints shows Sobhy saving 52.9%, whereas Purtseladze stands slightly behind at 51.14%. This might suggest a slight edge for Sobhy when the stakes are high. Nevertheless, when we look at their overall performance over the past year, Purtseladze has won 58.75% of his matches, against Sobhy’s 45.45%, indicating a superior consistency in match-play. Could this influence the final result?
When it comes to surface preference, both players thrive on hard courts. Sobhy has a win rate of 45% in his career, while Purtseladze has showcased a stronger performance with 61%. The historical matchup between these contenders at a similar event saw Purtseladze coming out on top, notably at the M 15 Sharm El Sheikh quarterfinals. Will history repeat itself in their head-to-head record, where Purtseladze currently holds the advantage?
Breaking down their performance in deciding sets, it's noteworthy that Purtseladze has won 61% of such encounters, outshining Sobhy's 31% over the past year. This could be crucial if their match extends to a third set. In head-to-head clashes in extreme pressure moments such as tiebreaks or deciding sets, neither has claimed victory, hinting at evenly matched nerves.
Finally, considering their opponent quality, Sobhy has faced stronger-ranked competitors on average than Purtseladze, reflecting potentially fierce competitive experiences. But does this prime Sobhy for victory down the wire, or will Purtseladze's consistent records in match wins and surface performance clinch the victory? Given the stats and current form, Purtseladze seems more favored to emerge victorious, though only the court will tell if these figures translate to triumph.
Purtseladze vs Sobhy Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Egor Agafonov
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Stuart Parker
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
44 of
52)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Mason Foxman
36%
(
18 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
12
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
F |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Erik Arutiunian
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Hamish Stewart
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Karim Ibrahim
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
8
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Alastair Gray
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Luc Wieland
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
57%
(
72 of
127)
1st Serve %
59%
(
80 of
135)
20
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
40%
(
22 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
49 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
55 of
135)
133
Total Points Won
129
|
6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hamish Stewart
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
96
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Cedric Stanke
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
23 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Louis Herman
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
55% (196/158) | Win/Loss | 42% (76/103) |
54% (438/368) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (181/221) |
52% (3976/3735) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1817/1898) |
63% (167/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (54/65) |
35% (26/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 37% (22/37) |
25% (3/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0.67 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
2518 | Aces Total | 284 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
1060 | Total Double Faults | 264 |
1:28:30 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
162.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 336.17 |
57% (12074/21302) | 1st Serve % | 56% (4113/7289) |
74% (8984/12074) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2663/4113) |
49% (4535/9228) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1535/3179) |
42% (807/1943) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (309/704) |
38% (8021/21206) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2854/7166) |
43% (3/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) |
0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
36% (16/29) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
59% (177/124) | Futures W/L | 43% (76/101) |
57% (194/343) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (73/173) |
0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
48% (58/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (18/33) |
56% (59/105) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (18/50) |
86% (191/165) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (81/66) |
13% (191/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (81/15) |
19% (163/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (98/10) |