F. Cina
To Win
S. Purtseladze
To Win
Saba Purtseladze vs Marek Gengel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W W W W
Form
L W W W L L L W W LHead To Head: Purtseladze 1 - 2 Gengel
They have played 7 sets in total, with Purtseladze winning 2 and Gengel winning 5. The last match between Purtseladze and Gengel was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 29-03-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Hard, with Saba Purtseladze getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Saba Purtseladze | 1 |
| Marek Gengel | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Sharm ElSheikh(29-03-2025)
Saba Purtseladze
Marek Gengel
6
7
6
4
6
4
| Purtseladze | Stats | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| 82% (45-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (14-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 286 | Ranking | 243 |
| 286 | Highest Rank | 229 |
| 23 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 17 |
| 56% (200-159) | Career Total W/L | 59% (376-262) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $3,280 |
| 5 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 2 |
Upcoming Match
- / Final
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sramkova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kovacevic VS Ruusuvuori PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Purtseladze VS Gengel H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Marek Gengel
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Saba Purtseladze
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Saba Purtseladze
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
Purtseladze VS Gengel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 25 | Games Won | 40 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:33:16 | Average Match Time | 1:33:16 |
| 54% (107/200) | 1st Serve % | 69% (129/188) |
| 68% (73/107) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (97/129) |
| 35% (33/93) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (27/59) |
| 50% (7/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 70% (14/20) |
| 34% (64/188) | Return Points Win % | 47% (94/200) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Purtseladze vs Gengel Match Preview :
In the intriguing world of tennis predictions, numbers often do the talking. When it comes to the second serve performance, both Marek Gengel and Saba Purtseladze have showcased their prowess over the past six months, with Gengel winning 41.75% of those points and Purtseladze slightly edging him out at 45.67%. Such a subtle difference might raise questions, yet it remains a crucial indicator of match outcomes.
Diving deeper into their return game stats, Gengel has secured 43.82% of his opponent's second serve points, while Purtseladze isn't far behind at 43.74%. For first serve return points, Gengel again holds a narrow advantage, capturing 24.3% compared to Purtseladze's 20.44%. These numbers suggest Gengel as a marginal favorite in this head-to-head matchup, but how might these stats play under the match's pressure?
Confronted with breakpoints, Gengel shines by saving 56.56%, while Purtseladze lags slightly with 52.96% saved. This resilience under pressure is highlighted during in-game predictions, reflecting patterns that might resonate with anxious spectators. Looking back over the past year, Gengel has won 71.43% of his matches (75/30), contrasting with Purtseladze's 56.96% (45/34), further tipping the scales in Gengel's favor.
The surface of play often influences outcomes significantly. On hard courts, Gengel boasts a career win rate of 67%, whereas Purtseladze's record is 60% on the same surface. Grass is Gengel's Achilles heel, with a winless record, but that is less relevant given the current playing surface. Comparing the quality of opponents over the past year, Gengel has squared off against players with an average ranking of 467.96, while Purtseladze has faced slightly stronger opponents, averaging rank 415.54.
Assessing past head-to-head encounters, Gengel holds a commanding lead with two wins over Purtseladze, claiming all four sets played between them. Their latest showdown at the Cassis Challenger saw Gengel triumph with a smooth 7-5, 6-0 victory. Interestingly, when matches stretch to deciding sets, Gengel has a stronger track record, securing 61% of those scenarios compared to Purtseladze's 53%. Likewise, Gengel's ability to convert breakpoints at a rate of 31.8% surpasses Purtseladze’s 26.83%, an advantage that might turn the tide during pivotal moments.
Based on the statistics and past performances, the scales tip towards Gengel as the favorite to win their upcoming encounter. Those seeking predictions grounded in numbers may find solace in Gengel's consistent edges over his rival Purtseladze.
Purtseladze vs Gengel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Saba Purtseladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Martin Damm
54%
(
61 of
113)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
24
Aces
21
7
Double Faults
5
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
56 of
63)
58%
(
30 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
25 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
114)
13
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
86%
(
64 of
74)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
61 of
75)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
29 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
30 of
114)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(5) 5-7 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Sergey Fomin
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
15
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Giles Hussey
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
2-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Saba Purtseladze
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
16
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Egor Agafonov
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Stuart Parker
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
44 of
52)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Mason Foxman
36%
(
18 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
12
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marek Gengel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Marek Gengel
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Hamish Stewart
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Mohamed Safwat
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
51
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Moraing
Player
Marek Gengel
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Konstantin Zhzhenov
Player
Marek Gengel
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Marek Gengel
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
4
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
10 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (200/159) | Win/Loss | 59% (376/262) |
| 54% (446/373) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (835/623) |
| 52% (4053/3811) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7254/6446) |
| 63% (171/101) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (272/135) |
| 35% (26/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 41% (56/79) |
| 25% (3/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (48/46) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.67 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 2587 | Aces Total | 2824 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1082 | Total Double Faults | 1276 |
| 1:29:1 | Average Match Time | 1:19:16 |
| 443.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 504.37 |
| 57% (12368/21774) | 1st Serve % | 63% (23725/37474) |
| 74% (9212/12368) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16703/23725) |
| 49% (4633/9406) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6864/13748) |
| 41% (813/1965) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1647/3866) |
| 38% (8161/21669) | Return Points Win % | 40% (15377/38455) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 43% (3/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 41% (20/29) | Challenger W/L | 39% (50/78) |
| 59% (177/125) | Futures W/L | 65% (325/177) |
| 57% (198/348) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (372/629) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (63/128) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (96/180) |
| 57% (62/108) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/188) |
| 87% (194/168) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (365/320) |
| 12% (194/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (365/44) |
| 19% (165/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (272/55) |
Purtseladze vs. Gengel Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
