F. Cina
To Win
T. A. Tirante
To Win
Saba Purtseladze vs Federico Cina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L L L L L
Form
W W L W W W L W L WH2H: Purtseladze 1 - 1 Cina
They have played 4 sets in total, with Purtseladze winning 2 and Cina winning 2. The last match between Purtseladze and Cina was at the Tbilisi Challenger, 24-05-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Hard, with Saba Purtseladze getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Saba Purtseladze | 1 |
| Federico Cina | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tbilisi Challenger(24-05-2025)
Saba Purtseladze
Federico Cina
7
6
6
4
| Purtseladze | Stats | Cina |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (46-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (22-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 254 | Ranking | 243 |
| 237 | Highest Rank | 243 |
| 23 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 2 |
| 55% (201-165) | Career Total W/L | 60% (55-37) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $35,260 |
| 6 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
16 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Siskova VS Li PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
16 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ymer VS Darderi PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
16 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Purtseladze VS Cina H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Federico Cina
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
32 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Saba Purtseladze
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Purtseladze VS Cina H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 23 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:36:34 | Average Match Time | 1:36:34 |
| 62% (86/139) | 1st Serve % | 59% (81/138) |
| 74% (64/86) | 1st Serve Win % | 84% (68/81) |
| 53% (28/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (27/57) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (2/12) |
| 31% (43/138) | Return Points Win % | 34% (47/139) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Purtseladze vs Cina Match Preview :
- Cina's recent second serve performance sees him winning 44.26% of points, slightly lower than Purtseladze’s 47.22%. This slight edge may sway predictions.
- For returning second serves, both players have similar recent stats with Cina at 45.08% and Purtseladze at 45.3%, indicating an even matchup.
- Cina outperforms Purtseladze in first serve returns, winning 26.03% compared to 20.5%, suggesting a potential advantage for Cina in this aspect.
- Under pressure, Cina saves 53.98% of breakpoints while Purtseladze saves 52.69%, hinting at a slight resilience advantage for Cina.
- While Cina has a recent match win rate of 66.07%, Purtseladze's is slightly higher at 68.09%, highlighting overall tournament competitiveness.
- On hard courts, Cina boasts a 65% career win rate, marginally better than Purtseladze's 63%, suggesting Cina might perform strong on this surface.
- Both players excel in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, each winning 77.78% of their matches, showcasing similar levels and competition experience.
- Historically, Cina leads in their personal head-to-head encounters, winning their only match in two straight sets, indicating a psychological edge.
- Cina has faced tougher opponents recently, with an average opponent rank of 313.45 compared to Purtseladze’s 449.48, potentially giving Cina a competitive edge.
- In all tour matches, Purtseladze’s 73% deciding set win rate is slightly higher than Cina’s 67%, hinting at a possible edge if the match extends.
- Cina’s stronger recent breakpoint conversion rate at 33.02% could be pivotal during crucial match points, compared to Purtseladze’s lower 26.73%.
Editorial Prediction (May 24, 2025, UTC):
Examining the recent performance statistics, both Cina and Purtseladze display comparable strengths in return games, especially on second serves. However, Cina shows more proficiency in converting first serve returns into points, potentially giving him an upper hand during pivotal moments.
Cina also demonstrates a slightly better breakpoint conversion rate which could turn critical under pressure, alongside stronger performance under pressure by saving more breakpoints. Meanwhile, Purtseladze exhibits slightly higher consistency in deciding sets, representing resilience in closer matches.
Factoring in their past head-to-head encounter, where Cina secured a straight sets win, and considering his recent experience against higher-ranked players, Cina might carry more confidence heading into this match.
Given these insights, despite the close stats, Cina appears to have a marginally greater advantage and is predicted to likely emerge as the winner in this upcoming match.
Purtseladze vs Cina Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Saba Purtseladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Saba Purtseladze
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
9
Aces
28
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
56 of
71)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
33 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
124)
115
Total Points Won
116
|
3-6 7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Saba Purtseladze
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
3
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Saba Purtseladze
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Saba Purtseladze
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Saba Purtseladze
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Saba Purtseladze
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
12
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Federico Cina
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
32 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Martin Damm
54%
(
61 of
113)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
24
Aces
21
7
Double Faults
5
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
56 of
63)
58%
(
30 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
25 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Cina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxim Mrva
Player
Federico Cina
44%
(
36 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Federico Cina
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Daniel Merida Aguilar
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Mili Poljicak
74%
(
67 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
1
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Federico Cina
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (201/165) | Win/Loss | 60% (55/37) |
| 54% (450/385) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (120/86) |
| 51% (4120/3903) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1043/939) |
| 63% (172/103) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (33/19) |
| 33% (26/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (22/18) |
| 25% (3/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.68 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2654 | Aces Total | 229 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1104 | Total Double Faults | 237 |
| 1:29:4 | Average Match Time | 1:41:46 |
| 441.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 353.99 |
| 57% (12666/22275) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3827/6271) |
| 74% (9424/12666) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (2624/3827) |
| 49% (4722/9609) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1237/2444) |
| 41% (823/1987) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (286/677) |
| 38% (8303/22129) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2656/6455) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 43% (3/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (21/34) | Challenger W/L | 55% (21/17) |
| 59% (177/125) | Futures W/L | 65% (32/17) |
| 56% (199/355) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (54/90) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (64/132) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 71% (25/35) |
| 56% (62/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (13/24) |
| 86% (197/169) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (55/47) |
| 13% (197/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (55/8) |
| 19% (169/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (37/8) |
Purtseladze vs. Cina Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
