Saba Purtseladze vs Dominic Stricker Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L L L L L
Form
W W W L L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Purtseladze 0 - 1 Stricker
They have played 2 sets in total, with Purtseladze winning 0 and Stricker winning 2. The last match between Purtseladze and Stricker was at the Wimbledon - London, 23-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Dominic Stricker getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Saba Purtseladze | 0 |
| Dominic Stricker | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(23-06-2025)
Dominic Stricker
Saba Purtseladze
6
3
6
2
| Purtseladze | Stats | Stricker |
|---|---|---|
| 75% (46-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (16-14) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 249 | Ranking | 238 |
| 237 | Highest Rank | 88 |
| 23 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 5 |
| 55% (201-164) | Career Total W/L | 56% (135-104) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $609,765 |
| 6 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Purtseladze VS Stricker H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Dominic Stricker
Player
Saba Purtseladze
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Purtseladze VS Stricker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 5 | Games Won | 12 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:55:0 | Average Match Time | 0:55:0 |
| 72% (44/61) | 1st Serve % | 81% (34/42) |
| 48% (21/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (26/34) |
| 35% (6/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 29% (12/42) | Return Points Win % | 56% (34/61) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Purtseladze vs Stricker Match Preview :
- Over the past six months, Purtseladze has slightly outperformed Stricker on second serve points, winning 46.88% compared to 44.56%. Can a marginal edge in second serve play influence match outcomes? It often does.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Purtseladze has a slight upper hand, securing 44.72% of points, while Stricker trails with 44.16%. Is this enough to indicate a stronger return game? It might be a nuanced advantage.
- Stricker leads Purtseladze in first serve return success, capturing 26.09% compared to Purtseladze's 20.33%. Does this hint at Stricker having a potential edge in returning powerful serves?
- Purtseladze excels in saving breakpoints, with a 52.46% success rate, slightly surpassing Stricker's 47.25%. Could this provide a psychological edge in high-pressure moments?
- In the past year, Purtseladze has demonstrated superior match performance, achieving a 68.54% win rate compared to Stricker's 50%. How significant is recent form when predicting match outcomes? It could be pivotal.
- The players have distinct surface strengths: Purtseladze thrives on Hard courts, while Stricker excels on Indoor Hard courts. Does this match surface favor one player over the other? Examining their surface success is crucial.
- Purtseladze has faced lower-ranked opponents on average, ranked 428.71, compared to Stricker's opponents averaging 245.3 in ranking. Can playing stronger opponents give Stricker a competitive edge?
- Purtseladze has shown formidable tenacity in deciding sets, winning 80% of them, whereas Stricker has a 55% success rate in such situations. Does this resilience offer Purtseladze a psychological advantage if the match extends?
- Stricker is slightly more effective in converting breakpoints, with a rate of 28.68% compared to Purtseladze's 26.34%. Could this efficiency in critical moments tilt the match in his favor?
Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the upcoming tennis match between Purtseladze and Stricker, several factors present themselves as potentially decisive. Purtseladze's overall consistency and superior win rate over the past year suggest a robust form that may challenge Stricker.
Purtseladze's performance under pressure, particularly in saving breakpoints and excelling in deciding sets, may prove crucial in high-stakes moments. This psychological resilience could be instrumental against a player like Stricker, who, despite facing higher-ranked opponents, shows weaknesses in tight scenarios.
However, Stricker's slight edge in first serve returns and breakpoint conversion rate presents him with opportunities to seize control. His experience against stronger opponents may also provide him with the tactics needed to counter Purtseladze's strengths.
Nevertheless, considering the multiple facets of performance and statistical trends, Purtseladze's balanced game and recent form make him the likely winner of this encounter. His ability to handle pressure and consistency in pivotal situations position him optimally for success.
Purtseladze vs Stricker Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Saba Purtseladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Saba Purtseladze
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
3
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Saba Purtseladze
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Saba Purtseladze
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Saba Purtseladze
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Saba Purtseladze
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
12
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Federico Cina
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
32 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Martin Damm
54%
(
61 of
113)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
24
Aces
21
7
Double Faults
5
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
56 of
63)
58%
(
30 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
25 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
114)
13
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
86%
(
64 of
74)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
61 of
75)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
29 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
30 of
114)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(5) 5-7 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
view more
Dominic Stricker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Dominic Stricker
58%
(
72 of
125)
1st Serve %
62%
(
73 of
118)
9
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
34%
(
42 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
118)
130
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Saba Purtseladze
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Dominic Stricker
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
48%
(
42 of
88)
9
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(5) 7-6(4) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Alexey Vatutin
46%
(
35 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Dominic Stricker
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Dominic Stricker
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(7) ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (201/164) | Win/Loss | 56% (135/104) |
| 54% (449/383) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (322/265) |
| 51% (4102/3886) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2929/2774) |
| 63% (172/102) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (17/19) |
| 33% (26/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (37/30) |
| 25% (3/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (65/42) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (16/13) |
| 0.67 | Aces Per Game | 0.63 |
| 2626 | Aces Total | 1779 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1099 | Total Double Faults | 739 |
| 1:28:50 | Average Match Time | 1:36:49 |
| 441.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 326.27 |
| 57% (12595/22151) | 1st Serve % | 57% (9720/17201) |
| 74% (9368/12595) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (7248/9720) |
| 49% (4695/9556) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3844/7481) |
| 41% (821/1982) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (598/1547) |
| 38% (8270/22022) | Return Points Win % | 37% (6645/17815) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 59% (19/13) |
| 43% (3/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (24/25) |
| 39% (21/33) | Challenger W/L | 58% (64/47) |
| 59% (177/125) | Futures W/L | 65% (28/15) |
| 56% (199/354) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (123/211) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 49% (64/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (65/119) |
| 57% (62/109) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (47/85) |
| 86% (196/169) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (130/108) |
| 13% (196/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (130/18) |
| 19% (169/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (109/27) |
Purtseladze vs. Stricker Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
