Saba Purtseladze vs Cem Ilkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In their recent form, both Cem Ilkel and Saba Purtseladze have shown competitiveness in their matches over the past six months. Ilkel has succeeded in winning 46.54% of points on his second serve, slightly ahead of Purtseladze's 46.06%. These figures typically show a direct correlation to predicting match outcomes.

The return game statistics further add to the prediction analysis. Ilkel has achieved a 40.89% return on his opponent's second serve points, whereas Purtseladze has outperformed slightly with 45.2%. When it comes to first serve returns, Ilkel leads with 25.91% over Purtseladze’s 20.96%. These aspects are significant when determining who holds the upper hand in head-to-head matchups.

Examining under pressure performances, Ilkel has managed to save 51.19% of breakpoints faced, while Purtseladze has a similar rate of 50.5%. This metric is often indicative of how players handle critical match points during games. Regarding overall form in the last year, Ilkel's match win percentage stands at 61.67% (W/L 37/23), and Purtseladze slightly leads with 63.22% (W/L 55/32).

Both players boast their most successful career win percentage on hard surfaces, Ilkel with 62% (W/L 287/177) and Purtseladze also at 62% (W/L 162/100). Their weakest performances have been noted on grass for Ilkel, with a 10% win rate (W/L 1/9), and on indoor hard courts for Purtseladze with a 25% win rate (W/L 3/9).

In the domain of match level, Ilkel has participated predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K over the previous year, achieving a win rate of 73.81% (W/L 31/11). Similarly, Purtseladze has excelled in the same tournament category having won 74.58% (W/L 44/15). The players' direct head-to-head encounters show a past match record tied with 1 win each, indicating a closely matched rivalry.

Interestingly, the average duration of previous direct matches between Ilkel and Purtseladze has been 1:55:28, suggesting their matches tend to be tightly contested. In deciding set scenarios, Purtseladze holds a slight edge over Ilkel, having won the only deciding set they’ve played against each other.

Overall, evaluating all the statistics currently available and their past performances against varied competition, this analysis tentatively favors Purtseladze for the upcoming match. However, the competitive nature and close head-to-head records imply that the match could be closely fought, with both players demonstrating the capacity to take control in crucial moments.