R. Peniston
To Win
B. Jones
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L W L W LForm
W L L L W L L W L LThey have played 6 sets in total, with Peniston winning 3 and Karlovskiy winning 3. The last match between Peniston and Karlovskiy was at the M25 Tbilisi, 14-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Ryan Peniston getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Ryan Peniston | 1 |
Evgeny Karlovskiy | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Tbilisi(14-05-2025)
Peniston | Stats | Karlovskiy |
---|---|---|
71% (32-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (15-16) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
263 | Ranking | 429 |
123 | Highest Rank | 211 |
29 | Age | 30 |
L | Plays | R |
9 | Titles | 12 |
61% (344-217) | Career Total W/L | 55% (436-351) |
$263,350 | Career Prize Money | $37,060 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
08 Jul 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 4-6 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Peniston
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Ryan Peniston
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
107)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
107)
110
Total Points Won
88
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
3 | Sets Won | 3 |
28 | Games Won | 29 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
2:17:14 | Average Match Time | 2:17:14 |
66% (133/202) | 1st Serve % | 62% (109/176) |
59% (78/133) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (72/109) |
57% (39/69) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (35/67) |
40% (8/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (9/21) |
39% (69/176) | Return Points Win % | 42% (85/202) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing recent performance, both players have specific strengths that could impact the outcome of this match. Karlovskiy holds a statistical advantage in second serve points won and has also demonstrated superior breakpoint saving ability.
Peniston, however, benefits from stronger first serve return statistics and has a notable edge in recent breakpoint conversion—an essential aspect that can affect crucial moments within the match.
While Karlovskiy has historically had an advantage in their previous encounters, Peniston's higher win rates against better-ranked opponents and superior deciding set performance suggest he might prevail if the match goes the distance.
Overall, based on the current form and head-to-head record, Karlovskiy is slightly favored to win the upcoming match but with a close contest expected.
Peniston vs Karlovskiy Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Martin Landaluce
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
69 of
109)
1st Serve %
79%
(
79 of
100)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Peniston
Player
Facundo Bagnis
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Emilio Nava
Player
Ryan Peniston
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Peniston
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Ryan Peniston
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ryan Peniston
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Peniston
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Peniston
Player
Kaichi Uchida
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dan Added
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Robert Strombachs
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Egor Gerasimov
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Chidekh
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Peniston
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Cem Ilkel
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
51%
(
47 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tim Handel
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve %
44%
(
4 of
9)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
16
Total Points Won
9
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (344/217) | Win/Loss | 55% (436/351) |
59% (754/515) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (986/809) |
54% (6330/5294) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8829/8174) |
67% (201/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (192/123) |
58% (42/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (95/97) |
56% (67/53) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (147/127) |
51% (34/33) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
1060 | Aces Total | 3075 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
1175 | Total Double Faults | 1763 |
1:21:52 | Average Match Time | 1:12:27 |
412.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 541.61 |
62% (18274/29446) | 1st Serve % | 67% (27301/40989) |
68% (12342/18274) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (19145/27301) |
51% (5686/11172) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6514/13688) |
43% (1500/3487) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1753/4177) |
42% (12870/30378) | Return Points Win % | 40% (16948/42588) |
25% (4/12) | Slam W/L | 50% (4/4) |
0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
41% (7/10) | Main Tour W/L | 16% (4/21) |
53% (110/96) | Challenger W/L | 49% (180/189) |
69% (223/98) | Futures W/L | 64% (248/137) |
61% (337/549) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (431/777) |
50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
53% (65/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (126/250) |
54% (82/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (106/220) |
88% (340/300) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (428/370) |
12% (340/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (428/58) |
20% (221/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (359/66) |