Ryan Nijboer vs Michele Ribecai Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W W L
Form
W L W L W W W L L LHead To Head: Nijboer 1 - 0 Ribecai
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 2 and Ribecai winning 0. The last match between Nijboer and Ribecai was at the M25 Santa margherita di Pula, 07-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ryan Nijboer | 1 |
| Michele Ribecai | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Santa margherita di Pula(07-05-2025)
Ryan Nijboer
Michele Ribecai
6
4
6
2
| Nijboer | Stats | Ribecai |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (23-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (20-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 437 | Ranking | 770 |
| 371 | Highest Rank | 738 |
| 25 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (278-212) | Career Total W/L | 61% (83-54) |
| $5,735 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Jones PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fognini VS Altmaier PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Michele Ribecai
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:33:22 | Average Match Time | 1:33:22 |
| 56% (28/50) | 1st Serve % | 54% (31/57) |
| 82% (23/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (15/31) |
| 55% (12/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 51% (29/57) | Return Points Win % | 30% (15/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nijboer vs Ribecai Match Preview :
- Recent second serve performance reveals Ribecai and Nijboer are quite similar, with Nijboer slightly ahead with 42.56% to Ribecai's 42.25%.
- Who performs better in return games? Ribecai has the edge by winning 47.29% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Nijboer's 46.91%.
- First serve return stats slightly favor Nijboer at 29.1%, over Ribecai's 28.68%.
- Under pressure, Nijboer demonstrates resilience, saving 52.36% of breakpoints, whereas Ribecai saves 48.88%.
- Over the last year, Ribecai boasts a 57.97% match win rate, which slightly surpasses Nijboer's 55.32% win rate.
- On their best surface, I.hard for Ribecai and Hard for Nijboer, Ribecai is a stronger performer with a 75% win rate versus Nijboer’s 59%.
- Nijboer's weaker performance on I.hard compared to Ribecai's, with a career win rate of 22%, could influence outcomes on similar surfaces.
- In terms of opponent quality, Ribecai faces tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 304.88, compared to Nijboer's 461.73.
- When matches go to a deciding set, Nijboer holds an advantage with a 45% win rate, over Ribecai's 25%.
- Examining break point conversion, Nijboer again holds a slight edge, converting 37.39% of opportunities, while Ribecai converts 31.9%.
Editorial Prediction (May 7, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the current form and statistical insights of both players, some trends become prominent. Nijboer slightly edges ahead in second serve performance, breakpoint conversion, and first serve returns, which are crucial components during match play.
Ribecai, however, demonstrates resilience in tackling higher-ranked opponents, often prevailing against more formidable opposition, a key factor that could sway the match in Ribecai's favor, especially in high-pressure moments.
Despite Ribecai's struggles in deciding sets, their superior performance on I.hard surfaces should not be overlooked, considering Nijboer’s relative weakness on similar surfaces.
Taking all factors into account, while discrepancies exist, Ribecai’s ability to perform under challenging conditions and opponent quality suggests they may edge out Nijboer in this upcoming match.
Nijboer vs Ribecai Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Lorenzo Bocchi
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gianluca Mager
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
29
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Imanol Lopez Morillo
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
98)
0
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Ryan Nijboer
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Francisco Rocha
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michele Ribecai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Michele Ribecai
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50
Total Points Won
48
|
3-6 6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Potenza
Player
Michele Ribecai
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
Player
Michele Ribecai
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michele Ribecai
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michele Ribecai
Player
Silvio Mencaglia
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
35
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michele Ribecai
Player
Jacopo Landini
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
45
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Michele Ribecai
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michele Ribecai
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (278/212) | Win/Loss | 61% (83/54) |
| 56% (640/500) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (186/118) |
| 53% (5595/4984) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (1545/1206) |
| 59% (97/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (31/19) |
| 58% (173/125) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (47/32) |
| 29% (8/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1117 | Aces Total | 100 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1713 | Total Double Faults | 250 |
| 1:33:33 | Average Match Time | 1:19:16 |
| 477 | Average Opponent Rank | 248.45 |
| 63% (18492/29328) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3915/6539) |
| 67% (12363/18492) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2460/3915) |
| 46% (4970/10836) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1326/2624) |
| 45% (1501/3305) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (376/829) |
| 43% (12722/29860) | Return Points Win % | 45% (3022/6732) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (35/45) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (242/163) | Futures W/L | 61% (83/54) |
| 57% (271/478) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (83/136) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (61/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (12/23) |
| 47% (75/160) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (11/31) |
| 83% (292/242) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (91/79) |
| 17% (292/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (91/11) |
| 18% (198/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (46/4) |
Nijboer vs. Ribecai Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
