Ryan Nijboer vs Lorenzo Bocchi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W W L L
Form
W W L W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Nijboer 1 - 0 Bocchi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 2 and Bocchi winning 0. The last match between Nijboer and Bocchi was at the Sassuolo Challenger, 16-06-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ryan Nijboer | 1 |
| Lorenzo Bocchi | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Sassuolo Challenger(16-06-2025)
Ryan Nijboer
Lorenzo Bocchi
6
4
6
2
| Nijboer | Stats | Bocchi |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (27-23) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (9-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 470 | Ranking | 739 |
| 371 | Highest Rank | 605 |
| 25 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 3 |
| 57% (282-215) | Career Total W/L | 53% (193-169) |
| $5,735 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kym VS Cazaux PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Bondar PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Lorenzo Bocchi
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:42:18 | Average Match Time | 1:42:18 |
| 75% (47/63) | 1st Serve % | 55% (34/62) |
| 66% (31/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (22/34) |
| 56% (9/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (10/28) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 48% (30/62) | Return Points Win % | 37% (23/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nijboer vs Bocchi Match Preview :
- Bocchi's second serve performance is slightly superior, winning 47.69% of points compared to Nijboer's 42.69%. Could this affect the match outcome significantly? Likely, as there's a high correlation with predictions.
- Regarding return games, Bocchi appears more effective against second serves, securing 47.62% of these points versus Nijboer's 46.47%.
- When handling first serve returns, Nijboer excels with a 28.7% success rate over Bocchi's 24.01%, indicating a potential strength.
- Under pressure, Bocchi has saved 57.33% of breakpoints faced, outpacing Nijboer's 51.28%, a critical aspect for betting predictions.
- In the past year, Bocchi has a higher match win percentage at 72% (18/7) compared to Nijboer's 57.61% (53/39), suggesting better overall form.
- Bocchi's strongest surface is clay with a 54% win rate, while Nijboer thrives on hard courts with 59% victories.
- Both players have excelled in $10K Futures tournaments, where Bocchi boasts a 70.83% win rate, slightly better than Nijboer's 66.67%.
- Bocchi has faced tougher competition on average, with opponents ranked 359, compared to Nijboer's average opponent ranking of 482.96.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Bocchi has a remarkable 71% win rate in such scenarios, much higher than Nijboer's 45%.
- Break point conversion rates show Bocchi converting 38.3% of opportunities, slightly outperforming Nijboer's 35.41%.
Editorial Prediction (June 16, 2025, UTC):
As we delve into the comparative stats of Bocchi and Nijboer, it's clear that Bocchi holds several significant advantages. The second serve performance and breakpoint saving percentages favor Bocchi, indicating better resilience and efficiency during matches.
Bocchi's ability to consistently face and overcome higher-ranked opponents may offer a critical edge in pressurized moments. Additionally, with a higher win percentage both overall and in decisive settings, Bocchi seems poised to manage critical junctures effectively.
Although Nijboer's strengths on hard court and in returning first serves cannot be underestimated, the overall statistical landscape tilts in Bocchi’s favor. Given these insights and performance metrics, Bocchi appears likely to clinch victory in the upcoming tennis match.
Nijboer vs Bocchi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Ryan Nijboer
77%
(
74 of
96)
1st Serve %
79%
(
77 of
98)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Ryan Nijboer
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alec Deckers
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
37%
(
24 of
65)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Romain Faucon
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Jarno Jans
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Stijn Slump
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Ryan Nijboer
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lorenzo Bocchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Leo Raquillet
Player
Lorenzo Bocchi
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
100)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
10
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Bocchi
Player
Andrin Casanova
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Bocchi
Player
Pietro Pampanin
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Lorenzo Bocchi
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Bocchi
Player
Chinmaya Dev Chauhan
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
40%
(
4 of
10)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
12
Total Points Won
6
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Lorenzo Bocchi
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Bocchi
Player
Kaichi Uchida
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
12
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandr Lobanov
Player
Lorenzo Bocchi
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
4
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (282/215) | Win/Loss | 53% (193/169) |
| 56% (650/507) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (428/394) |
| 53% (5685/5062) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3837/3627) |
| 59% (97/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (37/31) |
| 58% (177/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (154/131) |
| 29% (8/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1132 | Aces Total | 680 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1749 | Total Double Faults | 884 |
| 1:34:6 | Average Match Time | 1:25:29 |
| 482.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 425.17 |
| 63% (18849/29874) | 1st Serve % | 58% (10999/18814) |
| 67% (12601/18849) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (7238/10999) |
| 46% (5055/11025) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3762/7815) |
| 45% (1531/3368) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (898/2020) |
| 43% (12953/30395) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7836/18951) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (35/47) | Challenger W/L | 29% (6/15) |
| 60% (246/164) | Futures W/L | 55% (187/154) |
| 57% (275/485) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (184/351) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (5/5) |
| 47% (63/133) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (50/92) |
| 47% (76/163) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (53/99) |
| 83% (296/245) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (187/160) |
| 17% (296/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (187/26) |
| 18% (201/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (175/31) |
Nijboer vs. Bocchi Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
