R. Faucon
To Win
R. Nijboer
To Win
Ryan Nijboer vs Gianluca Mager Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L W W
Form
L W L W W L L L L LHead-To-Head: Nijboer 1 - 0 Mager
They have played 1 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 1 and Mager winning 0. The last match between Nijboer and Mager was at the Sassuolo Challenger, 15-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 7-5 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ryan Nijboer | 1 |
| Gianluca Mager | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Sassuolo Challenger(15-06-2025)
Ryan Nijboer
Gianluca Mager
7
5
| Nijboer | Stats | Mager |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (25-21) | YTD Win/Loss | 25% (5-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 454 | Ranking | 455 |
| 371 | Highest Rank | 62 |
| 25 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 11 |
| 57% (280-213) | Career Total W/L | 55% (403-331) |
| $5,735 | Career Prize Money | $668,315 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
11 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 ret. |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gianluca Mager
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 7 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:42:55 | Average Match Time | 0:42:55 |
| 64% (21/33) | 1st Serve % | 54% (14/26) |
| 71% (15/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 86% (12/14) |
| 50% (6/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 35% (9/26) | Return Points Win % | 36% (12/33) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nijboer vs Mager Match Preview :
- Nijboer has shown a second serve win rate of 42.7% in the last six months, while Mager has a better performance with 47.83%. Could this give Mager an upper hand in serve games?
- When returning, Nijboer captures 46.43% of points from opponents' second serves compared to Mager's 43.76%, providing Nijboer with a slight edge in return games.
- The first serve return stats give Nijboer the edge at 28.7%, compared to Mager’s 25.5%, which could be crucial in this head-to-head.
- Under pressure, Mager excels by saving 58.87% of breakpoints, surpassing Nijboer’s save rate of 51.58%. Does this indicate greater resilience from Mager?
- Looking at the past year, Nijboer has emerged victorious in 57.14% of matches, whereas Mager stands at a 50% success rate. This indicates slight consistency in Nijboer’s favor.
- On hard courts, Nijboer has a 59% win rate, which is significant in predicting outcomes, while Mager shines on clay with an identical win rate and might struggle more on indoor hard courts with a 44% win rate.
- Nijboer predominantly participates in Futures/ITF $10K events, winning 66.67% of his matches, while Mager competes more in Challengers/ITF > $10K, achieving a 31.03% win rate. Does this suggest Nijboer capitalizes on lower-tier events?
- The rankings of competitors faced by Nijboer are lower (average rank 481.63) compared to Mager (average rank 363.02), indicating Mager’s readiness against tougher competition.
- In deciding sets, Mager prevails 63% of the time, overshadowing Nijboer’s 45% success rate, which highlights Mager’s endurance and composure.
- Nijboer converts 35.1% of break points, while Mager stands at 23.4%, showcasing Nijboer’s efficiency in capitalizing on crucial opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 14, 2025, UTC):
As Nijboer and Mager prepare for their upcoming match, the stats present an intriguing competition. Both players showcase significant strengths and face respective challenges, making the prediction a compelling task.
Mager displays superior performance under pressure and against higher-ranked opponents, indicating his capability in crucial game moments. His second-serve performance further positions him advantageously in service games.
Conversely, Nijboer's proficiency in returning serves and converting breakpoints gives him a clear edge, particularly in disrupting Mager’s serve rhythm. His superior win rate over the past year adds to his favorability, albeit against lower-ranked competitors.
Their ability to perform on various surfaces also contributes to the intrigue. Nijboer's hard-court comfort and stronger match-winning record counterbalance Mager’s clay preference and challenger circuit resilience.
While each player flaunts distinctive advantages, the prediction tilts slightly towards Nijboer, leveraging his breakout capabilities in breaking serves and converting pressing situations.
Nijboer vs Mager Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Jarno Jans
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Stijn Slump
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Ryan Nijboer
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Lorenzo Bocchi
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gianluca Mager
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
29
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Imanol Lopez Morillo
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
98)
0
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gianluca Mager Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Gianluca Mager
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gianluca Mager
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
29
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Gianluca Mager
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Gianluca Mager
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Gianluca Mager
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Conner Huertas Del Pino
Player
Gianluca Mager
39%
(
12 of
31)
1st Serve %
35%
(
14 of
40)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
10 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (280/213) | Win/Loss | 55% (403/331) |
| 56% (644/502) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (927/788) |
| 53% (5627/5012) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8469/7923) |
| 59% (97/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (36/44) |
| 58% (175/126) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (330/235) |
| 29% (8/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (33/48) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 1120 | Aces Total | 3234 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1729 | Total Double Faults | 1697 |
| 1:33:42 | Average Match Time | 1:16:29 |
| 481.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 520.11 |
| 63% (18625/29542) | 1st Serve % | 59% (23971/40901) |
| 67% (12453/18625) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17137/23971) |
| 46% (5004/10917) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8450/16930) |
| 45% (1512/3333) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1557/3928) |
| 43% (12810/30062) | Return Points Win % | 38% (15898/41621) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 29% (6/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 37% (7/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (29/32) |
| 43% (35/46) | Challenger W/L | 53% (217/193) |
| 60% (244/163) | Futures W/L | 64% (143/79) |
| 57% (273/481) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (395/701) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 18% (3/17) |
| 47% (62/131) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (141/272) |
| 47% (75/160) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (124/239) |
| 83% (294/244) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (402/334) |
| 17% (294/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (402/67) |
| 18% (199/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (332/66) |
Nijboer vs. Mager Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
