Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Nijboer vs Filip Bergevi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Bergevi analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Filip Bergevi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 49.2% of points on his second serve, while Bergevi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 54.4% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bergevi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.54% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 56.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bergevi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 64.13% of matches played (W/L 59/ 33), with Bergevi winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Bergevi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 53/ 44), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.92% of matches (W/L 51/ 23), where as Bergevi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nijboer winning 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 2 and Bergevi winning 4. The last match between Nijboer and Bergevi was at the M25 Falun, 01-10-2019, First, I.hard with Filip Bergevi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Bergevi have played a deciding set 2 times, with Nijboer winning 0 times and Bergevi 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 1, and Bergevi 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.42 while Bergevi has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bergevi has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 46.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bergevi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nijboer 0 - 2 Bergevi
483
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
900
Rank
568
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
57% (217-165)
Career Total W/L
54% (157-134)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$1,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Filip Bergevi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 4 |
| Games Won | 31 | 35 |
| Aces (Total) | 23 | 34 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:25:30 | 2:25:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (121/194) | 63% (153/241) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (88/121) | 76% (117/153) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (36/73) | 40% (35/88) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (5/25) | 70% (7/10) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (89/241) | 36% (70/194) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats 
Filip Bergevi
Player
Ryan Nijboer
62%
(
76 of
122)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
21
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
6
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
40 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
101)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Ryan Nijboer
65%
(
77 of
119)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
13
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
33%
(
14 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
49 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Filip Bergevi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (35/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (308/256) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 109 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 101 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:36 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 218.73 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1030/1739) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (729/1030) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (358/709) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (93/205) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (758/1802) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Francesco Passaro
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Ryan Nijboer
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Filip Bergevi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcelo Zormann
Player
Filip Bergevi
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
36 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Dahlin
Player
Filip Bergevi
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Alejandro Hoyos
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Filip Bergevi
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Filip Bergevi
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
Filip Bergevi
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Filip Bergevi
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
11
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Filip Bergevi
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Filip Bergevi
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nijboer Vs Bergevi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ryan Nijboer
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
