Ryan Nijboer vs Daniel DE Jonge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Jonge analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Daniel DE Jonge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 49.22% of points on his second serve, while Jonge has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 53.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jonge has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.3% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 55.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonge has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 62.22% of matches played (W/L 56/ 34), with Jonge winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Jonge has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.11% of matches (W/L 51/ 25), where as Jonge has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.88 while Jonge has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonge has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 45.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonge has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nijboer 0 - 0 Jonge
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ryan Nijboer | Daniel DE Jonge |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (21/18) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (205/176) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.49 | N/A |
Aces Total | 90 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.39 | N/A |
DFs Total | 73 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:24 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 188.18 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 55% (647/1167) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 72% (469/647) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (268/520) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (59/132) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 41% (505/1218) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 64% (9/5) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | N/A |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
F |
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Karl Friberg
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Martin Landaluce
53%
(
60 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
76 of
126)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
8
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
39 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
51 of
126)
125
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Rafael Giotis
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Luka Mikrut
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Daniel DE Jonge Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Massimo Giunta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Cina
Player
Daniel De Jonge
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ignasi Forcano
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Daniel De Jonge
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
12
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
8
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Daniel De Jonge
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more