Ryan Nijboer vs Christopher Heyman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Heyman analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Christopher Heyman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 48.8% of points on his second serve, while Heyman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 53.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Heyman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.17% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 53.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heyman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 62.22% of matches played (W/L 56/ 34), with Heyman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.11% of matches (W/L 51/ 25), where as Heyman has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nijboer winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 0 and Heyman winning 2. The last match between Nijboer and Heyman was at the Murcia Challenger, 03-04-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Christopher Heyman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Heyman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nijboer winning 0 times and Heyman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 0, and Heyman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.88 while Heyman has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heyman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 46.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heyman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nijboer 0 - 1 Heyman
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
483
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
812
Rank
258
High
30
Age
L
Plays
19
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
Form
57% (211-162)
Career Total W/L
64% (352-201)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ryan Nijboer | Christopher Heyman |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 5 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:23:14 | 1:23:14 |
1st Serve % | 83% (44/53) | 64% (35/55) |
1st Serve Win% | 57% (25/44) | 74% (26/35) |
2nd Serve Win% | 44% (4/9) | 70% (14/20) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 50% (3/6) |
Return Points W% | 27% (15/55) | 45% (24/53) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Ryan Nijboer
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
83%
(
44 of
53)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ryan Nijboer | Christopher Heyman |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (21/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (205/176) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.49 | 0 |
Aces Total | 90 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
DFs Total | 73 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:24 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 188.18 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (647/1167) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (469/647) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (268/520) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (59/132) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (505/1218) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
F |
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Karl Friberg
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Martin Landaluce
53%
(
60 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
76 of
126)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
8
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
39 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
51 of
126)
125
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Rafael Giotis
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Luka Mikrut
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Christopher Heyman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Michiel De Krom
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Olivier Rojas
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christopher Heyman
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more