Ryan Nijboer vs Alvaro Lopez San Martin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Martin analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Alvaro Lopez San Martin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 49.22% of points on his second serve, while Martin has won 59.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 53.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while Martin has won 52.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.18% and 40.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 56.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martin has saved 33.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 63.44% of matches played (W/L 59/ 34), with Martin winning 47.22% (W/L 17/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Martin has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 28/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.92% of matches (W/L 51/ 23), where as Martin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Nijboer winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 3 and Martin winning 4. The last match between Nijboer and Martin was at the M25 Sabadell, 29-09-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Alvaro Lopez San Martin getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Martin have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nijboer winning 0 times and Martin 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 0, and Martin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 163.91 while Martin has played against players with an average rank of 279.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martin has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 45.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martin has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nijboer 1 - 2 Martin
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
483
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
665
Rank
280
High
26
Age
R
Plays
14
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
14
Minor
Form
57% (217-165)
Career Total W/L
66% (293-151)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$6,035
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ryan Nijboer | Alvaro Lopez San Martin |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
Sets Won | 3 | 4 |
Games Won | 29 | 36 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 16 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:20 | 1:56:20 |
1st Serve % | 57% (123/217) | 55% (107/193) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (78/123) | 68% (73/107) |
2nd Serve Win% | 39% (37/94) | 42% (36/86) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (11/20) | 65% (15/23) |
Return Points W% | 44% (84/193) | 47% (102/217) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Ryan Nijboer
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
4-6 6-1 6-1 |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
6-3 7-5 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ryan Nijboer | Alvaro Lopez San Martin |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 58% (35/25) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (308/256) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.4 | 0 |
Aces Total | 109 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.37 | 0 |
DFs Total | 101 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:47:36 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 218.73 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (1030/1739) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (729/1030) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (358/709) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (93/205) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (758/1802) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Francesco Passaro
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Ryan Nijboer
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Alvaro Lopez San Martin Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Saul Romero Guerra
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
120)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
120)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(7) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Alejandro Juan Mano
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Ryan Nijboer
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
74)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Ian Luca Cervantes Tomas
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more