D. Martin
To Win
H. Moriya
To Win
Rudy Quan vs Dan Martin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L W L L
Form
W W W L L L L W L LH2H: Quan 1 - 0 Martin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Quan winning 2 and Martin winning 0. The last match between Quan and Martin was at the Little Rock Challenger, 28-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Rudy Quan getting the victory 6-3 2-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rudy Quan | 1 |
| Dan Martin | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Little Rock Challenger(28-05-2025)
Rudy Quan
Dan Martin
6
3
2
0
| Quan | Stats | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (7-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (24-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 789 | Ranking | 563 |
| 666 | Highest Rank | 513 |
| 19 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 58% (38-27) | Career Total W/L | 52% (95-87) |
| $14,730 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
McCabe VS Valdes PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
15 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Uchijima VS Schunk PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
14 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-0 ret. |
Stats 
Rudy Quan
Player
Dan Martin
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
44
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 8 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:2:19 | Average Match Time | 1:2:19 |
| 70% (21/30) | 1st Serve % | 71% (34/48) |
| 71% (15/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (20/34) |
| 67% (6/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (5/14) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (23/48) | Return Points Win % | 30% (9/30) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Quan vs Martin Match Preview :
- Second Serve Strength: Both players show nearly identical strength on their second serves, with Quan winning 42.86% of points and Martin just behind at 42.79%. Does this affect the prediction? Yes, but it suggests minimal advantage here.
- Return Game Edge: Quan seems stronger in return games, winning 53.85% of opponent's second serve points versus Martin's 46.3%, and slightly better in first serve returns (26.72% vs. Martin’s 25.93%). Could Quan's return skills tilt the match in their favor? Likely, given Quan’s dominant return statistics.
- Handling Pressure: In terms of saving breakpoints, Martin slightly edges Quan with 54.19% compared to Quan’s 53.33%, showing Martin's capability to withstand pressure slightly better.
- Overall Performance: Martin holds a higher match win rate in the last year with 54.79% vs. Quan's 53.33%. Will this reflect in their upcoming encounter? It's an indicator that both are closely matched over a longer period.
- Preferred Surface: Quan plays best on Hard, winning 60% of matches, while Martin prefers Clay with a 58% win rate. Does surface preference decide the match? Depending on the event surface, this might be crucial.
- Player Level Comparison: Quan's recent matches are mostly in Challengers/ITF > $10K with a 50% win-rate, contrasting Martin's lower-level Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K matches with a slightly better win rate of 53.45%.
- Opponent Quality: Quan faces higher-ranked opponents (average rank of 214.13) compared to Martin's (average rank of 378.05). Does this suggest a tougher competition edge for Quan? Potentially, yes.
- Deciding Set Performances: Quan is stronger in deciding sets with a 67% win rate, compared to Martin’s 48%. Is it better to bet on Quan if the match goes the distance? It certainly looks that way.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Quan is superior in converting breakpoints with 46.15%, against Martin's 30.24%. Could this be a game-changer if opportunities arise? Definitely a significant edge for Quan.
Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):
Upon evaluating recent performances and key statistics, Quan stands out with exceptional return games and breakpoint conversion, aspects crucial for turning matches.
Despite Martin's slight edge in handling pressure, Quan’s ability to perform against higher-ranked opponents suggests better resilience.
Additionally, Quan's superior deciding set statistics presents an advantage should the match extend to a final set.
Taking these factors into account, Quan is poised with a favorable prediction to emerge victorious in this upcoming matchup.
Quan vs Martin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Rudy Quan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Brunkow
Player
Rudy Quan
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Dickerson
Player
Rudy Quan
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
83%
(
79 of
95)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
1
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
47 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Phillip Jordan
86%
(
48 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Rudy Quan
44%
(
23 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Christopher Papa
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jack Anthrop
Player
Rudy Quan
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Noah Zamora
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Peter Makk
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Dan Martin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Dan Martin
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Dan Martin
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
68%
(
19 of
28)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
7 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
36
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pranav Kumar
Player
Dan Martin
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Dan Martin
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
44
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Dan Martin
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kuang Qing Xu
Player
Dan Martin
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Oliver Okonkwo
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (38/27) | Win/Loss | 52% (95/87) |
| 56% (83/66) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (211/193) |
| 52% (733/685) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1937/1782) |
| 59% (32/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (47/45) |
| 57% (4/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (30/22) |
| 50% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (18/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 27 | Aces Total | 343 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 138 | Total Double Faults | 344 |
| 1:14:13 | Average Match Time | 1:23:7 |
| 289.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 374.51 |
| 70% (2085/2986) | 1st Serve % | 62% (5705/9270) |
| 59% (1227/2085) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3782/5705) |
| 45% (402/901) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1767/3565) |
| 48% (185/388) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (371/889) |
| 46% (1378/2978) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3513/9006) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (8/6) | Challenger W/L | 41% (13/19) |
| 59% (29/20) | Futures W/L | 55% (82/67) |
| 58% (38/65) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (93/178) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 69% (9/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (19/41) |
| 63% (12/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (20/42) |
| 94% (34/32) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (100/85) |
| 6% (34/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (100/15) |
| 19% (31/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (82/10) |
Quan vs. Martin Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
