Rudolf Molleker vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L W L L L
Form
W L W L W L L L W LHead-to-head: Molleker 0 - 1 Wong
They have played 2 sets in total, with Molleker winning 0 and Wong winning 2. The last match between Molleker and Wong was at the Glasgow Challenger, 17-02-2025, First, I.hard with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Glasgow Challenger(17-02-2025)
6
3
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
5
Games Won
12
4
Aces (Total)
4
5
Total Double Faults
2
0:59:12
Average Match Time
0:59:12
64% (38/59)
1st Serve %
53% (24/45)
63% (24/38)
1st Serve Win %
83% (20/24)
43% (9/21)
2nd Serve Win %
76% (16/21)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (3/8)
20% (9/45)
Return Points Win %
44% (26/59)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rudolf Molleker vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rudolf Molleker 0 - 1 Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Tennis Match Predictions:
- Recent Form - Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Molleker has displayed an impressive prowess on their second serve, winning an exceptional 52.99% of points, while Wong has achieved a respectable 47.87% success rate. Notably, there exists a significant correlation between this statistical metric and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Recent Form - Return Game Statistics: Analyzing the return game statistics, Molleker's recent form showcases their ability to triumph in effectively returning their opponent's second serve, winning an impressive 49.87% of points. Conversely, Wong achieves a slightly lower success rate of 46.16%. Moreover, when considering first serve returns, their respective stats stand at 26.37% and 28.96% respectively. Undoubtedly, these figures hold substantial relevance in determining the favorite contender in this highly-anticipated head-to-head (H2H) clash.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Under intense pressure, Molleker has demonstrated his ability to save breakpoints at a rate of 54.25% in recent matches. Comparatively, Wong exhibits an even more commendable performance, adeptly saving breakpoints at an impressive rate of 65.18%. Consequently, this statistical analysis proves invaluable when making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Considering their performance over the past year, Molleker has attained a victory rate of 44.26% from the matches played, culminating in a win-loss record of 27/34. On the other hand, Wong impressively clinched victory in 53.16% of matches, boasting a win-loss record of 42/37. Consequently, this provides us with a comprehensive and accurate overview to predict the outcome of their head-to-head encounter.
- Best Surface: Notably, Molleker exhibits exceptional proficiency on clay courts, boasting a remarkable career win percentage of 58% (W/L 170/124). Conversely, their performance on grass courts suffers, with a significantly lower win percentage of 27% (W/L 3/8). Wong, on the other hand, excels on hard courts, dominating with a career win percentage of 60% (W/L 112/76). Conversely, their prowess on grass courts falters, failing to secure any victories (W/L 0/4).
- Player Level: Over the past year, Molleker's predominant participation has been in the Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K. Impressively, they have achieved a commendable victory rate of 45.83% (W/L 22/26). Conversely, Wong has engaged in numerous matches within the same tournament category, securing victories in 55% of matches played (W/L 33/27). Therefore, when evaluating player statistics to determine the favorite, one must consider the relative event level at which they compete.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Notably, in the last 12 months, Molleker has consistently faced opponents with an average rank of 272.61. In contrast, Wong has encountered players with a marginally lower average rank of 255.03. These opponent quality metrics play a crucial role in predicting the outcome of matches.
- Deciding Set Performance vs All Players: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting, in cases where the match enters a deciding set, Molleker has successfully secured victory in 30% of their deciding sets throughout the past 12 months. On the contrary, Wong boasts an impressive winning rate of 61% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics provide valuable insight for in-game betting tips.
- Current Event Head-to-Head (H2H) Statistics: While evaluating player performance history is germane to predicting tennis matches, it is equally significant to monitor current event statistics for an accurate indication of the players' current form. For an in-depth insight into their performance in the ongoing event, refer to the section below. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge that certain players tend to perform exceptionally well in specific events, thus requiring consideration when determining the ultimate outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent records indicate that Molleker has effectively converted 39.04% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Wong has displayed a slightly lower conversion rate of 35.12% when seizing chances to break their opponents' serve. These revealing statistics represent invaluable information for in-game live betting tips when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are intrigued by tennis match prediction models, this exceptional article serves as an excellent starting point. Please note that an affinity for statistics is essential to fully appreciate its contents.
Rudolf Molleker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Rudolf Molleker
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Rudolf Molleker
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
34 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Finn Bass
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Rudolf Molleker
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
14
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
16 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Florent Bax
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Rudolf Molleker
51%
(
55 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
98)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Rudolf Molleker
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
93%
(
38 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Antoine Cornut-Chauvinc
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
14
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Benjamin Hassan
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
52% (237/215)
Win/Loss
56% (137/108)
52% (548/508)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (306/264)
51% (5132/4987)
Games Win/Loss
51% (2804/2679)
46% (27/32)
Hard Win/Loss
59% (113/79)
58% (170/124)
Clay Win/Loss
51% (18/17)
42% (37/51)
Indoor Hard W/L
43% (6/8)
27% (3/8)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/4)
0.45
Aces Per Game
0.48
2213
Aces Total
1285
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.19
1355
Total Double Faults
501
1:29:44
Average Match Time
1st Match
474.48
Average Opponent Rank
380.67
60% (18380/30805)
1st Serve %
60% (8991/14993)
70% (12907/18380)
1st Serve Win %
71% (6352/8991)
50% (6251/12425)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (2897/6002)
44% (1131/2589)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (577/1434)
37% (11302/30152)
Return Points Win %
39% (5882/15132)
47% (8/9)
Slam W/L
33% (2/4)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
40% (2/3)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
63% (5/3)
31% (12/27)
Main Tour W/L
38% (3/5)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
48% (115/125)
Challenger W/L
55% (53/44)
65% (102/54)
Futures W/L
60% (72/49)
53% (235/445)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
55% (132/240)
0% (0/4)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (3/3)
46% (67/146)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (43/78)
52% (77/149)
Deciding Set Win %
57% (45/79)
82% (242/199)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (127/111)
18% (242/43)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (127/16)
18% (210/37)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (118/25)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
