Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ruben Bemelmans vs Tristan Lamasine Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bemelmans vs Lamasine analysis and find out who is favored!
Ruben Bemelmans vs Tristan Lamasine Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bemelmans has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lamasine has won 49.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bemelmans, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lamasine has won 51.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bemelmans has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamasine has saved 54.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bemelmans has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lamasine winning 69.05% (W/L 58/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84). Lamasine has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 88/ 61), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 173/ 152).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bemelmans winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Bemelmans winning 4 and Lamasine winning 2. The last match between Bemelmans and Lamasine was at the Cherbourg Challenger, 11-02-2020, Second, I.hard with Ruben Bemelmans getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bemelmans and Lamasine have played a deciding set 2 times, with Bemelmans winning 2 times and Lamasine 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bemelmans winning 0, and Lamasine 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bemelmans has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lamasine has played against players with an average rank of 239.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bemelmans has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamasine has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bemelmans has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamasine has converted 44.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bemelmans 2 - 0 Lamasine
841
Rank
84
High
36
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
1
Grass0
285
Rank
181
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
57% (552-419)
Career Total W/L
55% (420-338)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
59% (19-13)
$1,013,488
Career Prize Money
$160,780
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Tristan Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 33 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:7 | 2:3:7 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (127/175) | 63% (133/212) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (90/127) | 62% (83/133) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (25/48) | 49% (39/79) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (9/16) | 27% (4/15) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (90/212) | 34% (60/175) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Tristan Lamasine
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
77 of
127)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
77)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
118
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| 3-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Tristan Lamasine
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Tristan Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (19/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (40/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (371/351) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (17/9) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 104 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:44:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 217.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (1413/2271) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (985/1413) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (422/858) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (94/209) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (928/2328) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (19/13) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (18/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 89% (18/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 11% (18/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 21% (14/3) |
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tristan Lamasine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Arthur Weber
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Tristan Lamasine
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jiri Vesely
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
53 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Antoine Escoffier
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(9) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Lucas Poullain
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Filip Krajinovic
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Bemelmans Vs Lamasine Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tristan Lamasine
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
