Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ruben Bemelmans vs Tennys Sandgren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bemelmans vs Sandgren analysis and find out who is favored!
Ruben Bemelmans vs Tennys Sandgren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bemelmans has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sandgren has won 51.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bemelmans, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sandgren has won 48.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bemelmans has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sandgren has saved 66.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bemelmans has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Sandgren winning 54.39% (W/L 31/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84). Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bemelmans winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bemelmans winning 2 and Sandgren winning 1. The last match between Bemelmans and Sandgren was at the French Open - Paris, 21-05-2013, Q1 round, Clay with Ruben Bemelmans getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bemelmans and Sandgren have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bemelmans winning 1 times and Sandgren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bemelmans winning 0, and Sandgren 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bemelmans has played against opponents with an average rank of while Sandgren has played against players with an average rank of 277.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bemelmans has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sandgren has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bemelmans has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sandgren has converted 30.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bemelmans 1 - 0 Sandgren
841
Rank
84
High
36
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
260
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
57% (552-419)
Career Total W/L
57% (421-324)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
62% (13-8)
$1,013,488
Career Prize Money
$2,256,263
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 20 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:43:0 | 2:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (71/113) | 59% (79/134) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (51/71) | 73% (58/79) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (24/42) | 40% (22/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (54/134) | 34% (38/113) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 5-7 9-7 |
Stats 
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Tennys Sandgren
63%
(
71 of
113)
1st Serve %
59%
(
79 of
134)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
79)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
54 of
134)
129
Total Points Won
118
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (13/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (33/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (285/247) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.88 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 230 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:55:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 296.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (1007/1685) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (782/1007) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (347/678) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (49/149) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (601/1688) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 61% (11/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (13/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 64% (9/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 79% (14/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 21% (14/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Bemelmans Vs Sandgren Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tennys Sandgren
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
