Ruben Bemelmans vs Nino Serdarusic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bemelmans vs Serdarusic analysis and find out who is favored!
Ruben Bemelmans vs Nino Serdarusic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bemelmans has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Serdarusic has won 50.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bemelmans, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Serdarusic has won 47.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bemelmans has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Serdarusic has saved 61.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bemelmans has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Serdarusic winning 51.61% (W/L 32/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84). Serdarusic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 290/ 203), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bemelmans winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Bemelmans winning 4 and Serdarusic winning 0. The last match between Bemelmans and Serdarusic was at the Tunis Challenger, 16-04-2019, Second, Clay with Ruben Bemelmans getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bemelmans and Serdarusic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bemelmans winning 0 times and Serdarusic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bemelmans winning 0, and Serdarusic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bemelmans has played against opponents with an average rank of while Serdarusic has played against players with an average rank of 329.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bemelmans has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Serdarusic has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bemelmans has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Serdarusic has converted 41.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bemelmans 2 - 0 Serdarusic
20
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
14
Minor
841
Rank
84
High
36
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
353
Rank
167
High
27
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
Form
57% (552-419)
Career Total W/L
54% (345-292)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (7-7)
$1,013,488
Career Prize Money
$79,735
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bemelmans VS Serdarusic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Nino Serdarusic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 24 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 10 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 8 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:10:59 | 1:10:59 |
1st Serve % | 65% (65/100) | 59% (73/123) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (46/65) | 60% (44/73) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (19/35) | 38% (19/50) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 59% (10/17) | 30% (3/10) |
Return Points W% | 49% (60/123) | 35% (35/100) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Bemelmans VS Serdarusic H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Nino Serdarusic
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
6-2 6-3 |
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Nino Serdarusic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Nino Serdarusic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (18/17) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (177/156) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.47 |
Aces Total | 0 | 77 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.1 |
DFs Total | 0 | 17 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:53:21 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 273.86 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (688/1061) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (496/688) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (189/373) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (40/96) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (356/980) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 63% (8/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (8/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (6/2) |
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Nino Serdarusic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Stefano Reitano
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Nino Serdarusic
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
22 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Zdenek Kolar
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Matteo Martineau
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cezar Cretu
Player
Nino Serdarusic
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Edas Butvilas
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Handel
Player
Nino Serdarusic
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Svyatoslav Gulin
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Nikola Milojevic
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
9
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Nino Serdarusic
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
118)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
118)
115
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more