Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ruben Bemelmans vs Maximilian Marterer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bemelmans vs Marterer analysis and find out who is favored!
Ruben Bemelmans vs Maximilian Marterer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bemelmans has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Marterer has won 52.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bemelmans, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marterer has won 52.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 23.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bemelmans has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marterer has saved 61.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bemelmans has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Marterer winning 58.82% (W/L 40/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84). Marterer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 69/ 46), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bemelmans winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Bemelmans winning 4 and Marterer winning 1. The last match between Bemelmans and Marterer was at the Eckental Challenger, 03-11-2015, First, Carpet with Ruben Bemelmans getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:33:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bemelmans and Marterer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bemelmans winning 1 times and Marterer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Bemelmans winning 1, and Marterer 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bemelmans has played against opponents with an average rank of while Marterer has played against players with an average rank of 258.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bemelmans has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marterer has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bemelmans has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marterer has converted 38.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bemelmans 2 - 0 Marterer
841
Rank
84
High
36
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
101
Rank
45
High
28
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
57% (552-419)
Career Total W/L
59% (381-261)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
27% (4-11)
$1,013,488
Career Prize Money
$1,511,690
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Maximilian Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 31 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:33:42 | 0:33:42 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (27/50) | 52% (34/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 93% (25/27) | 68% (23/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (14/23) | 47% (15/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (28/66) | 22% (11/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Maximilian Marterer
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Maximilian Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 27% (4/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 31% (11/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (158/195) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 67 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 43 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:53:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 189 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (712/1140) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (477/712) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (206/428) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (26/68) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 34% (370/1077) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 27% (3/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 29% (4/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 9% (11/1) |
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maximilian Marterer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
38 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(5) 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Maximilian Marterer
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Maximilian Marterer
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Elias Ymer
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Maximilian Marterer
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Luca Van Assche
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
16
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Yanki Erel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Maximilian Marterer
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Bemelmans Vs Marterer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
