Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Danique Havermans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Marie Nijkamp vs D. Havermans

Rose Marie Nijkamp
NED
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
23
-
Height
-
717
C. Rank
0
717
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Danique Havermans
NED
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
23
-
Height
-
717
C. Rank
0
717
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Nijkamp 1 - 0 Havermans
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rose Marie Nijkamp winning 2 and Danique Havermans winning 0. The last match between Rose Marie Nijkamp and Danique Havermans was at the W15 Alkmaar, 27-06-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Rose Marie Nijkamp getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nijkamp | 1 |
| Havermans | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Alkmaar(06-27-24)
Rose Marie Nijkamp
6
6
Danique Havermans
0
3
R. M. Nijkamp vs D. Havermans H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.29% (41-27) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (51-51) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. M. Nijkamp vs D. Havermans Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rose Marie Nijkamp has won 36.33% of points on their second serve, while Danique Havermans has won 38.40%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rose Marie Nijkamp, in recent form, has won 54.66% of their opponent's second serve points, while Danique Havermans has won 54.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.51% and 31.20% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rose Marie Nijkamp has saved 44.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Danique Havermans has saved 51.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rose Marie Nijkamp has won 68.42% of matches played (W/L 26/12), with Danique Havermans winning 60.00% (W/L 21/14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rose Marie Nijkamp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 32/18), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 9/9). Danique Havermans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 16/9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/12).
- Player level: In the last year, Rose Marie Nijkamp has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/11), where as Danique Havermans has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rose Marie Nijkamp winning 1 times and Danique Havermans being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Rose Marie Nijkamp winning 2 and Danique Havermans winning 0.
- The last match between Rose Marie Nijkamp and Danique Havermans was at the W15 Alkmaar, 27-06-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Rose Marie Nijkamp getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rose Marie Nijkamp has played against opponents with an average rank of 356.29 while Danique Havermans has played against players with an average rank of 44.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rose Marie Nijkamp has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Danique Havermans has won 78% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rose Marie Nijkamp has converted 41.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Danique Havermans has converted 38.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Danique Havermans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. M. Nijkamp vs D. Havermans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:7:0 | Average Match Time | 1:7:0 |
| 59% (24/41) | 1st Serve % | 62% (34/55) |
| 71% (17/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (16/34) |
| 41% (7/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (5/21) |
| 50% (7/14) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 62% (34/55) | Return Points Win % | 41% (17/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Nijkamp 41%, Havermans 39%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Nijkamp 60%, Havermans 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Nijkamp 57%, Havermans 57%.
R. M. Nijkamp Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0 | ||
QF | W | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
F | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
D. Havermans Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 3-6 6-0 10-7 | ||
QF | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||

R. M. Nijkamp vs D. Havermans Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.29% (41/27) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (51/51) |
| 59.62% (93/63) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.07% (119/114) |
| 53.62% (762/659) | Games Win/Loss | 50.67% (1129/1099) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (6/12) |
| 64.00% (32/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.15% (29/30) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.00% (16/9) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 58 | Aces Total | 80 |
| 0.67 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 468 | Total Double Faults | 250 |
| 1:42:21 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 397.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 236.16 |
| 61% (2715/4447) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1958/3147) |
| 60% (1623/2715) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1195/1958) |
| 40% (695/1732) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (480/1189) |
| 53% (324/614) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (186/391) |
| 50% (2175/4362) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1456/3182) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Challenger W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 64.10% (25/14) | Futures W/L | 50.54% (47/46) |
| 60% (41/68) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (51/102) |
| 44% (4/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (7/14) |
| 45% (9/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 86% (43/37) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (55/45) |
| 14% (43/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (55/10) |
| 16% (25/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (47/6) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction10:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction09:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction08:05 PM 16/11/25
Prediction07:05 PM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:05
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
18:20
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
18:25
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal