Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Danique Havermans Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijkamp vs Havermans analysis and find out who is favored!
Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Danique Havermans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nijkamp 1 - 0 Havermans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijkamp has won 38.7% of points on their second serve, while Havermans has won 40.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijkamp, in recent form, has won 60.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Havermans has won 59.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.64% and 39.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijkamp has saved 52.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Havermans has saved 50.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijkamp has won 55% of matches played (W/L 11/ 9), with Havermans winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijkamp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 13/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Havermans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijkamp has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 8/ 7), where as Havermans has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nijkamp winning 1 times and Havermans being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nijkamp winning 2 and Havermans winning 0. The last match between Nijkamp and Havermans was at the W15 Alkmaar, 27-06-2024, Second, Clay with Rose Marie Nijkamp getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijkamp and Havermans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nijkamp winning 0 times and Havermans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijkamp winning 0, and Havermans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijkamp has played against opponents with an average rank of 390.55 while Havermans has played against players with an average rank of 76.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijkamp has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Havermans has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijkamp has converted 52.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Havermans has converted 55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
52% (14-13)
Career Total W/L
44% (28-36)
59% (10-7)
YTD W/L
53% (8-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Danique Havermans For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nijkamp VS Havermans
| stats | Rose Marie Nijkamp | Danique Havermans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:0 | 1:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (24/41) | 62% (34/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (17/24) | 47% (16/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (7/17) | 24% (5/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 62% (34/55) | 41% (17/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Danique Havermans
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
9
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
17 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rose Marie Nijkamp | Danique Havermans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (10/7) | 53% (8/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (21/17) | 56% (18/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (177/164) | 52% (149/136) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 54% (7/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.74 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 123 | 43 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:7 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 409.24 | 112.73 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (695/1155) | 60% (251/420) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (421/695) | 60% (151/251) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (178/460) | 37% (62/169) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (86/164) | 58% (28/48) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (572/1135) | 47% (191/404) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 57% (8/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 53% (8/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (6/0) |
Rose Marie Nijkamp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Rose Marie Nijkamp
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Nicole Gadient
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Karolina Kozakova
Player
Rose Marie Nijkamp
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Friederike Nolte
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Rikke De Koning
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
20%
(
5 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Mina Hodzic
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
5
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Rose Marie Nijkamp
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
8
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Mina Hodzic
53%
(
52 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
4
13
Double Faults
6
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Rose Marie Nijkamp
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Timea Jaruskova
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Danique Havermans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tayisiya Morderger
Player
Danique Havermans
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Danique Havermans
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Danique Havermans
Player
Min Chae Kim
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Danique Havermans
Player
Melissa Boyden
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Danique Havermans
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
9
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
17 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danique Havermans
Player
Antonia Stoyanov
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Nijkamp Vs Havermans Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nijkamp are available here and Havermans photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
