Rosalie Van Der Hoek vs Eva Vedder Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoek vs Vedder analysis and find out who is favored!
Rosalie Van Der Hoek vs Eva Vedder Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Vedder has won 44.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vedder has won 55.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vedder has saved 48.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Vedder winning 42.86% (W/L 18/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 25/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Vedder has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 112/ 79), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoek winning 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Hoek winning 0 and Vedder winning 1. The last match between Hoek and Vedder was at the W15 Oldenzaal, 14-08-2019, First, Clay with Eva Vedder getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoek and Vedder have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hoek winning 0 times and Vedder 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hoek winning 0, and Vedder 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Vedder has played against players with an average rank of 216.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vedder has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vedder has converted 45.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hoek 0 - 1 Vedder
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
801
Rank
759
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
418
Rank
221
High
24
Age
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
34% (57-111)
Career Total W/L
58% (188-136)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,438
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Rosalie Van Der Hoek | Eva Vedder |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
Sets Won | 0 | 1 |
Games Won | 7 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:17:0 | 1:17:0 |
1st Serve % | 40% (18/45) | 50% (28/56) |
1st Serve Win% | 83% (15/18) | 79% (22/28) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (15/27) | 54% (15/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 100% (1/1) |
Return Points W% | 34% (19/56) | 33% (15/45) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(7) 1-1 ret. |
Eva Vedder
Player
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
40%
(
18 of
45)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
15 of
18)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
49
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Rosalie Van Der Hoek | Eva Vedder |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (28/33) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.23 |
Aces Total | 0 | 7 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.33 |
DFs Total | 0 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 2:1:20 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 55 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 51% (108/213) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (65/108) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (42/105) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 59% (13/22) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (102/207) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Rosalie Van Der Hoek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
Player
Jennifer Luikham
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
8
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
10
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Adrienn Nagy
Player
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ankita Raina
Player
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
44%
(
18 of
41)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Anna Blinkova
Player
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hanyu Guo
Player
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Eva Vedder Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Leonie Kung
Player
Eva Vedder
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
43%
(
28 of
65)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eva Vedder
Player
Virginia Ferrara
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
13
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
Player
Eva Vedder
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
57
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
Player
Eva Vedder
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eva Vedder
Player
Gabriela Ce
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Renata Zarazua
Player
Eva Vedder
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Eva Vedder
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Amina Anshba
Player
Eva Vedder
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
1-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nadiya Kolb
Player
Eva Vedder
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eva Vedder
Player
Tilde Stromquist
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more