Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Roosh Wijesundera vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wijesundera vs Elkin analysis and find out who is favored!
Roosh Wijesundera vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wijesundera has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Elkin has won 42.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wijesundera, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Elkin has won 51.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wijesundera has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Elkin has saved 45.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wijesundera has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Elkin winning 39.02% (W/L 16/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wijesundera has played against opponents with an average rank of while Elkin has played against players with an average rank of 79.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wijesundera has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Elkin has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wijesundera has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Elkin has converted 58.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wijesundera 0 - 0 Elkin
N/A
Rank
High
32
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
34% (21-40)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
36% (4-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wijesundera VS Elkin H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Roosh Wijesundera | Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (10/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (97/114) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.54 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:23:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 118.45 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (390/635) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (246/390) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (111/245) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 59% (32/54) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (237/580) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Roosh Wijesundera Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Emma Van Poppel
59%
(
72 of
123)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
3
Aces
7
15
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
49%
(
25 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
50 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ellie Daniels
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolyn Campana
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Julia Peer
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Mia-Leigh Cilliers
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Waligora
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Tiana Philippides
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Wijesundera Vs Elkin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
