Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Roopa Bains vs Jemma Carbis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bains vs Carbis analysis and find out who is favored!
Roopa Bains vs Jemma Carbis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bains has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Carbis has won 34.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bains, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carbis has won 47.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 24.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bains has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carbis has saved 32.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bains has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Carbis winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bains has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 13/ 20). Carbis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bains winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bains winning 2 and Carbis winning 0. The last match between Bains and Carbis was at the W60 Playford, 24-10-2022, Q3, Hard with Roopa Bains getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bains and Carbis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bains winning 0 times and Carbis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bains winning 0, and Carbis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bains has played against opponents with an average rank of while Carbis has played against players with an average rank of 179.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bains has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carbis has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bains has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carbis has converted 35.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bains 1 - 0 Carbis
870
Rank
769
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
42% (18-25)
Career Total W/L
35% (7-13)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Roopa Bains | Jemma Carbis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (22/38) | 58% (38/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 95% (21/22) | 55% (21/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 75% (12/16) | 48% (13/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (31/65) | 13% (5/38) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Roopa Bains
Player
Jemma Carbis
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
13%
(
5 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Roopa Bains | Jemma Carbis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (11/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (94/99) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.01 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 179.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 72% (143/198) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (74/143) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (19/55) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (66/200) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Roopa Bains Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Barbir
Player
Roopa Bains
44%
(
15 of
34)
1st Serve %
42%
(
14 of
33)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
53%
(
8 of
15)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
53%
(
18 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ya-Yi Yang
Player
Roopa Bains
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roopa Bains
Player
Ashlee Narker
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roopa Bains
Player
Sophia Fry
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
En Shuo Liang
Player
Roopa Bains
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lily Taylor
Player
Roopa Bains
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Roopa Bains
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Roopa Bains
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roopa Bains
Player
Tamara Bajagic
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Jemma Carbis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Jemma Carbis
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
49
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jemma Carbis
Player
Leilany Ipunesso
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
55
|
1-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sophia Bursulaya
Player
Jemma Carbis
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 5-7 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Jemma Carbis
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
69%
(
22 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Bains Vs Carbis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
