Prediction of Romina Ccuno [725th] vs Eva Vedder [264th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L W L
Form
W W L L W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Ccuno 0 - 0 Vedder
| Ccuno | Stats | Vedder |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (10-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (13-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 725 | Ranking | 264 |
| 628 | Highest Rank | 221 |
| 22 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 52% (88-82) | Career Total W/L | 58% (234-169) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $9,620 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Romina Ccuno vs Eva Vedder Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ccuno 0 - 0 Vedder
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ccuno has won 38.9% of points on their second serve, while Vedder has won 43.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ccuno, in recent form, has won 51.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vedder has won 48.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.44% and 30.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ccuno has saved 43.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vedder has saved 49.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ccuno has won 52% of matches played (W/L 26/ 24), with Vedder winning 60% (W/L 45/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ccuno has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 87/ 77), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Vedder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 80/ 56), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Ccuno has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 16/ 18), where as Vedder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.32% of matches (W/L 38/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ccuno has played against opponents with an average rank of 439.84 while Vedder has played against players with an average rank of 350.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ccuno has won 73% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vedder has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ccuno has converted 34.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vedder has converted 40.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Romina Ccuno vs Eva Vedder Best Odds For The Match
Romina Ccuno Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Romina Ccuno
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Romina Ccuno
Player
Natalia Sousa Salazar
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
52%
(
46 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michaela Bayerlova
Player
Romina Ccuno
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Romina Ccuno
Player
Maria Eduarda Lages
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Romina Ccuno
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve %
75%
(
3 of
4)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
7
Total Points Won
1
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Romina Ccuno
Player
Maria Kononova
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
46%
(
21 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
40
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Romina Ccuno
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Romina Ccuno
Player
Maria Kononova
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Romina Ccuno
Player
Carla Markus
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
55%
(
11 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
55%
(
17 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
32
Total Points Won
42
|
1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Eva Vedder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Eva Vedder
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Antonia Ruzic
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Eva Vedder
81%
(
68 of
84)
1st Serve %
95%
(
53 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Jule Niemeier
102%
(
61 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julieta Pareja
Player
Eva Vedder
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
41%
(
46 of
111)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Eva Vedder
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Eva Vedder
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Anouk Koevermans
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Thaisa Grana Pedretti
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Ccuno vs Vedder?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ccuno Vs Vedder is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (88/82) | Win/Loss | 58% (234/169) |
| 52% (196/182) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (527/393) |
| 51% (1680/1644) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4527/3959) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 233 | Aces Total | 998 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 491 | Total Double Faults | 987 |
| 1:22:56 | Average Match Time | 1:31:24 |
| 432.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 445.77 |
| 60% (5969/9908) | 1st Serve % | 58% (13759/23640) |
| 60% (3591/5969) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (8789/13726) |
| 43% (1708/3938) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4816/9936) |
| 49% (649/1334) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1404/2933) |
| 47% (4658/9838) | Return Points Win % | 46% (11030/24187) |
| 52% (87/168) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (230/398) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 46% (13/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (42/89) |
| 47% (18/38) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (55/118) |
| 88% (88/77) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (247/206) |
| 13% (88/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (247/40) |
| 13% (82/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (156/27) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
