F. Tiafoe
To Win
R. Safiullin
To Win
Roman Safiullin vs Arthur Rinderknech Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L L L
Form
W L L W L W L L W LHead-2-Head: Safiullin 2 - 1 Rinderknech
They have played 7 sets in total, with Safiullin winning 4 and Rinderknech winning 3. The last match between Safiullin and Rinderknech was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 23-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Arthur Rinderknech getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Roman Safiullin | 2 |
| Arthur Rinderknech | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(23-04-2025)
Arthur Rinderknech
Roman Safiullin
7
6
6
1
| Safiullin | Stats | Rinderknech |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (9-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 29% (7-17) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 73 | Ranking | 72 |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 42 |
| 27 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 25 | Titles | 11 |
| 65% (407-221) | Career Total W/L | 59% (311-215) |
| $2,059,255 | Career Prize Money | $1,856,950 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
26 May 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kovacevic VS Ruusuvuori PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fearnley VS Wawrinka PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Safiullin VS Rinderknech H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Roman Safiullin
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 2-6 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
60%
(
73 of
122)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
2
Aces
15
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
43%
(
53 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
103
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
Safiullin VS Rinderknech H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 34 | Games Won | 32 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 28 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:38:48 | Average Match Time | 1:38:48 |
| 61% (142/232) | 1st Serve % | 66% (128/194) |
| 70% (100/142) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (98/128) |
| 50% (45/90) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (24/66) |
| 50% (8/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 26% (7/27) |
| 37% (72/194) | Return Points Win % | 38% (87/232) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Safiullin vs Rinderknech Match Preview :
The analysis of recent second serve performance shows that Arthur Rinderknech and Roman Safiullin have similar success rates, with Rinderknech winning 46.91% of points and Safiullin slightly trailing at 46.4%. This statistic is crucial in forecasting match outcomes. On the return game front, Safiullin has a stronger record, capturing 49.93% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Rinderknech's 43.87%. For first serve returns, Safiullin maintains a slight edge with 24.07% over Rinderknech's 22.69%, enhancing his position as the more favorable contender in head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, Rinderknech excels by saving 58.62% of breakpoints, while Safiullin manages 55.68%. These statistics impact in-game betting scenarios and predictions significantly. In terms of overall performance across the past year, Safiullin leads with a win rate of 55.74% (W/L 34/27), overshadowing Rinderknech’s 44.26% (W/L 27/34). This provides a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head potential.
Regarding their respective best surfaces, Rinderknech performs best on indoor hard courts with a 61% win rate (W/L 97/62) but struggles most on grass, winning 48% (W/L 15/16). Conversely, Safiullin excels on hard surfaces with a remarkable 70% win rate (W/L 230/100) but has a lower success rate on clay courts at 58% (W/L 85/61). When evaluating player levels, Rinderknech has competed more frequently on the main tour, with a 44.12% win rate (W/L 15/19), while Safiullin’s main tour participation stands at a 35% win rate (W/L 7/13). These are critical details when relating match predictions to event levels.
In their direct head-to-head encounters, Safiullin holds a perfect record, winning both previous matches. Their last meeting at the Tel Aviv Watergen Open in 2022 ended in Safiullin's favor with a score of 6-4, 6-1. The total of five sets played between them resulted in four wins for Safiullin. Additionally, the average match duration stands at 1:47:16, offering insight for future matchup forecasts. For deciding set scenarios, Safiullin emerges victorious in their sole deciding set, promising a notable advantage.
Safiullin’s previous victories, along with his superior surface adaptability and better breakpoint conversion rate of 28.87% compared to Rinderknech’s 24.72%, position him as the likely victor in this upcoming challenge. While tie-break scenarios remain barren in their history, the comparative rank of their opponents, with Rinderknech facing an average rank of 77.11 versus Safiullin’s 105.18, does not overshadow Safiullin's prevailing head-to-head superiority. Thus, based on this extensive analytical comparison, Roman Safiullin is favored to triumph in their forthcoming encounter.
Safiullin vs Rinderknech Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Roman Safiullin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Roman Safiullin
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Roman Safiullin
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Roman Safiullin
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Dusan Lajovic
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
53
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
72%
(
89 of
124)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
58 of
89)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
124)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
5-7 7-5 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Alexander Blockx
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Roman Safiullin
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
15
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
29 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
13 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Alexei Popyrin
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
113)
7
Aces
20
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
55 of
71)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
26 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Arthur Rinderknech Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
5
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Mark Lajal
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
109)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
50 of
67)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
109)
110
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Roman Safiullin
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (407/221) | Win/Loss | 59% (311/215) |
| 62% (920/572) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (726/554) |
| 54% (7751/6473) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6583/5942) |
| 70% (231/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (100/69) |
| 57% (85/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (99/68) |
| 61% (78/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (97/62) |
| 59% (13/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (15/16) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.63 |
| 2918 | Aces Total | 3875 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1800 | Total Double Faults | 1173 |
| 1:29:37 | Average Match Time | 1:40:19 |
| 442.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 351.89 |
| 64% (25680/40374) | 1st Serve % | 64% (22709/35394) |
| 71% (18315/25680) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (17032/22709) |
| 51% (7532/14694) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6381/12684) |
| 43% (1780/4164) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1163/3089) |
| 40% (16615/41425) | Return Points Win % | 36% (13216/36423) |
| 56% (20/16) | Slam W/L | 45% (14/17) |
| 57% (25/19) | Masters W/L | 38% (15/24) |
| 50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 48% (42/46) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (77/69) |
| 58% (130/94) | Challenger W/L | 63% (93/54) |
| 81% (185/43) | Futures W/L | 70% (110/47) |
| 65% (382/587) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (299/492) |
| 54% (15/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 36% (9/25) |
| 52% (113/218) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (113/234) |
| 54% (113/209) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (109/196) |
| 87% (391/339) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (294/249) |
| 13% (391/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (294/43) |
| 27% (236/64) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (231/60) |
Safiullin vs. Rinderknech Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
