Prediction of Roger Taylor vs Pancho Guzman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Taylor vs P. Guzman

Roger Taylor

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Pancho Guzman

ECU

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Taylor 1 - 0 Guzman

They have played 3 sets in total, with Roger Taylor winning 2 and Pancho Guzman winning 1. The last match between Roger Taylor and Pancho Guzman was at the London, 17-06-1968, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Roger Taylor getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Taylor	1
Guzman	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) London(06-17-68)

Stats

Roger Taylor

Pancho Guzman

R. Taylor vs P. Guzman H2H Profile

R. Taylor	Stats	P. Guzman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
55.93% (382-301)	Career Total W/L	40.86% (38-55)
1	Grass	0
9	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Taylor vs P. Guzman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roger Taylor has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pancho Guzman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roger Taylor, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pancho Guzman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Roger Taylor has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pancho Guzman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Roger Taylor has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Pancho Guzman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Roger Taylor has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 99/63), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 80/66). Pancho Guzman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 24/25), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 5/12).
Player level: In the last year, Roger Taylor has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Pancho Guzman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Roger Taylor winning 1 times and Pancho Guzman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Roger Taylor winning 2 and Pancho Guzman winning 1.
The last match between Roger Taylor and Pancho Guzman was at the London, 17-06-1968, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Roger Taylor getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roger Taylor has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pancho Guzman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roger Taylor has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pancho Guzman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Roger Taylor has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pancho Guzman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Roger Taylor vs Pancho Guzman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Taylor vs P. Guzman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Taylor	Stats	P. Guzman
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Taylor Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wembley - 10-11-1980
R3 Tomas SmidT. Smid	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Bournemouth - 08-09-1980
R3 Angel GimenezA. Gimenez	L	2-6 7-5 6-0	Stats
Wimbledon - 23-06-1980
R1 Terry RocavertT. Rocavert	L	6-1 3-6 2-6 6-4 6-3	Stats
Beckenham CH - 02-06-1980
R3 Hubertus HoytH. Hoyt	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R4 Leo PalinL. Palin	L	6-1 6-0	Stats

View All

P. Guzman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Davis Cup SAM QF: ECU vs COL - 20-03-1972
Robin Jairo VelascoJ. Velasco	L	2-6 6-3 6-4 6-4	Stats
Robin Ivan MolinaI. Molina	L	6-3 3-6 7-5 6-0	Stats
Montreal / Toronto - 10-08-1971
R3 Pat CramerP. Cramer	W	5-7 6-2 7-5	Stats
R4 John NewcombeJ. Newcombe	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Tanglewood - 24-07-1971
R2 Sandy MayerS. Mayer	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

R. Taylor vs P. Guzman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Taylor	Stats	P. Guzman
55.93% (382/301)	YTD Win/Loss	40.86% (38/55)
55.25% (974/789)	Sets Win/Loss	43.56% (98/127)
50.89% (10701/10325)	Games Win/Loss	48.13% (1066/1149)
54.79% (80/66)	Hard Win/Loss	29.41% (5/12)
55.62% (94/75)	Clay Win/Loss	48.98% (24/25)
51.93% (94/87)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (4/6)
61.11% (99/63)	Grass Win/Loss	29.41% (5/12)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
474.12	Average Opponent Rank	413.48
56.92% (37/28)	Slam W/L	9.09% (1/10)
56.25% (9/7)	Masters W/L	66.67% (8/4)
68.75% (11/5)	Cups W/L	30.77% (4/9)
55.40% (323/260)	Main Tour W/L	43.86% (25/32)
66.67% (2/1)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
56% (279/501)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (31/60)
59% (83/140)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	26% (6/23)
41% (7/17)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
49% (109/221)	Deciding Set Win %	63% (15/24)
82% (368/300)	1st Set Won, Won Match	73% (37/27)
18% (368/65)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	27% (37/10)
24% (303/74)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (46/10)