Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Robin Stanek vs Tomas Jirousek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stanek vs Jirousek analysis and find out who is favored!
Robin Stanek vs Tomas Jirousek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stanek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jirousek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stanek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jirousek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stanek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jirousek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stanek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jirousek winning 64.29% (W/L 9/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stanek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 79/ 36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 111/ 111). Jirousek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 85/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stanek winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Stanek winning 0 and Jirousek winning 2. The last match between Stanek and Jirousek was at the M15 Rovinj, 21-03-2019, Second, Clay with Tomas Jirousek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stanek and Jirousek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Stanek winning 0 times and Jirousek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stanek winning 0, and Jirousek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stanek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jirousek has played against players with an average rank of 85.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stanek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jirousek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stanek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jirousek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stanek 0 - 1 Jirousek
Ret.
Rank
258
High
29
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
891
Rank
762
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
56% (246-192)
Career Total W/L
55% (93-75)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Robin Stanek | Tomas Jirousek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 1 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (28/42) | 67% (24/36) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 43% (12/28) | 83% (20/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 21% (3/14) | 67% (8/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 22% (8/36) | 64% (27/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Tomas Jirousek
Player
Robin Stanek
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
1
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Robin Stanek | Tomas Jirousek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Robin Stanek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Robin Stanek
72%
(
87 of
121)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
116
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Milan Welte
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Jan Satral
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
7 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
42
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Robin Stanek
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve %
81%
(
13 of
16)
5
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
22
Total Points Won
10
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Kaichi Uchida
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Matyas Cerny
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Palosi
Player
Robin Stanek
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
84%
(
58 of
69)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Adria Soriano Barrera
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Liska
Player
Robin Stanek
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
82%
(
58 of
71)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomas Jirousek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Tomas Jirousek
59%
(
64 of
108)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
104)
2
Aces
6
13
Double Faults
8
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(0) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Jirousek
Player
Lech Gontar
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tomas Jirousek
Player
Maciej Kos
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tomas Jirousek
Player
Thorben Sannen
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Samuel Brosset
Player
Tomas Jirousek
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
91)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Tomas Jirousek
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stanek Vs Jirousek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
