R. C. Subervi
To Win
B. Kuzuhara
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W L W WForm
W W L W W W W W L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Subervi winning 2 and Bailly winning 0. The last match between Subervi and Bailly was at the M25 Santo Domingo, 29-03-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Hard, with Roberto Cid Subervi getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Roberto Cid Subervi | 1 |
Gilles Arnaud Bailly | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Santo Domingo(29-03-2025)
Subervi | Stats | Bailly |
---|---|---|
65% (11-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 72% (28-11) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
428 | Ranking | 487 |
211 | Highest Rank | 468 |
31 | Age | 19 |
R | Plays | - |
14 | Titles | 4 |
58% (314-224) | Career Total W/L | 58% (77-56) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $11,010 |
1 | YTD Titles | 2 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
- / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
23 May 2025 / Q3
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33
Total Points Won
19
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
0:45:38 | Average Match Time | 0:45:38 |
79% (15/19) | 1st Serve % | 55% (18/33) |
87% (13/15) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (9/18) |
25% (1/4) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (5/15) |
38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
58% (19/33) | Return Points Win % | 26% (5/19) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
How crucial is the second serve when foreseeing success in a tennis match? For Bailly, in the recent half-year, winning 42.39% of points on their second serve suggests a solid foundation. Subervi, in comparison, has managed to secure 37.7% during the same time span. This subtle difference often serves as a talisman for predicting outcomes, particularly when their skills are put to the test.
Now, let's scrutinize their return game prowess. In an insightful revelation, Bailly has outperformed by winning 44.69% when returning on their opponent's second serve, whereas Subervi trails slightly at 43.72%. Yet, when it comes to handling the first serve, Subervi edges out Bailly with 30.94% compared to Bailly's 28.67%. How much influence do these numbers hold in determining a likely victor in this encounter?
Under the microscope of pressure, the breakpoint-saving ability becomes essential. Bailly has successfully saved 45.45% of breakpoints, slightly surpassing Subervi's mark of 44.77%. This ability to fend off potential breaks is invaluable for those pondering in-game strategy and forecasting future scenarios.
Considering their previous year's performance overview, Subervi has captured victory in 65.31% of their matches (W/L 32/17), whereas Bailly has won 61.22% (W/L 30/19). Subervi’s percentage indicates a marginally stronger performance. Onto court surfaces, both players favor Hard courts, with Bailly achieving a 71% win rate (W/L 27/11) and Subervi at 61% (W/L 135/87). Let us not overlook the surfaces where they falter — Bailly with I.hard at 27% and Subervi on Grass, at an unusual 0%.
Exploring the competitive arena level, Bailly, despite playing extensively in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, boasts a 60.87% win rate, while Subervi, performing predominantly in similar events, shines with a 79.41% success rate. The insights are representative of their competitive ladder stature and help frame the predictions accordingly.
Delve into the quality of opponents: Bailly’s average adversary ranks 345 while Subervi’s opponents average 355.55 — a nuanced detail reflecting their battlegrounds and challenges. To top it off is how they cope in deciding sets — Subervi shines bright with a 57% win rate compared to Bailly's 36%. This could be the deciding factor should they find themselves locked in a final-set battle.
Examining their breakpoint conversion — another decisive stat. Subervi here turns the tide, converting 47.22% of opportunities compared to Bailly’s 36.3%. It's a compelling figure for avid followers wagering on in-game scenarios. All said and done, though Bailly shows a competitive edge on several fronts, the overarching synopsis inclines towards Subervi clinching the match. The amalgamation of these stats paints Subervi as the predicted champion of this clash.
Subervi vs Bailly Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Gavin Goode
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
12
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
2
94%
(
32 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rafael Jodar
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Garrett Johns
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
90)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Christoph Negritu
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
52%
(
58 of
111)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
117
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Abel Forger
55%
(
55 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
64 of
117)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
13 of
53)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
58 of
117)
119
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Stijn Pel
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
10 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
41
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Lucas Marionneau
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Alex Molcan
Player
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58% (314/224) | Win/Loss | 58% (77/56) |
56% (708/549) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (168/122) |
53% (6124/5415) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1442/1243) |
61% (138/88) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (27/12) |
58% (162/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (47/36) |
42% (14/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27% (3/8) |
0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
854 | Aces Total | 175 |
0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
1428 | Total Double Faults | 187 |
1:26:47 | Average Match Time | 1:46:52 |
498 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.47 |
61% (18025/29429) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5355/8271) |
66% (11897/18025) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (3416/5355) |
48% (5494/11404) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1439/2916) |
47% (1636/3515) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (466/993) |
44% (13102/29857) | Return Points Win % | 44% (3654/8303) |
0% (0/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
27% (4/11) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) |
42% (83/113) | Challenger W/L | 21% (3/11) |
71% (227/91) | Futures W/L | 63% (71/42) |
59% (306/523) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (77/132) |
38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
46% (62/136) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 72% (23/32) |
55% (98/179) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (11/25) |
85% (297/252) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (80/73) |
15% (297/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (80/7) |
25% (241/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (53/4) |