A. Ganesan
To Win
R. C. Subervi
To Win
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Cannon Kingsley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L W W W
Form
L L L W W L L W W LHead-2-Head: Subervi 1 - 0 Kingsley
They have played 3 sets in total, with Subervi winning 2 and Kingsley winning 1. The last match between Subervi and Kingsley was at the San Luis Potosi Challenger, 15-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Roberto Cid Subervi getting the victory 6-1 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Roberto Cid Subervi | 1 |
| Cannon Kingsley | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: San Luis Potosi Challenger(15-04-2025)
Roberto Cid Subervi
Cannon Kingsley
6
1
4
6
6
4
| Subervi | Stats | Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (12-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (11-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 428 | Ranking | 512 |
| 211 | Highest Rank | 404 |
| 31 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 1 |
| 58% (315-224) | Career Total W/L | 58% (129-94) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Semifinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kovacevic VS Ruusuvuori PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Rakhimova PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:11:30 | Average Match Time | 2:11:30 |
| 57% (49/86) | 1st Serve % | 62% (50/81) |
| 73% (36/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (31/50) |
| 49% (18/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (12/31) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 47% (38/81) | Return Points Win % | 37% (32/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Subervi vs Kingsley Match Preview :
Analyzing second serve performance in the recent months provides significant insights for predicting match outcomes. Kingsley has notably secured 41.89% of points on their second serve in the last six months. In contrast, Subervi has achieved a slightly lower rate of 37.53%, indicating Kingsley could have an edge in this aspect.
Examining the return game statistics, Subervi outperforms Kingsley by a margin in winning second serve return points, with Subervi at 45.28% compared to Kingsley's 40.67%. The difference is even more pronounced in first serve returns, where Subervi dominates with a 30.05% as opposed to Kingsley's 23.6%. These metrics suggest Subervi could have a tactical advantage in this area.
Under pressure, both players have shown resilience, although slightly more so on Kingsley's part. Kingsley has managed to save 48.65% of breakpoints faced, while Subervi has saved 46.32%. This measure can be crucial for betting predictions, highlighting Kingsley’s potential ability to withstand critical moments better.
Reviewing the overall performance, Kingsley claims a 53.85% win rate (W/L 28/24) over the past year. Subervi, however, demonstrates a stronger record with a 66% win rate (W/L 33/17), suggesting Subervi enters this match with greater form and consistency.
Surface preferences further differentiate the players' strengths. Kingsley excels on clay with a 64% win rate (W/L 32/18), whereas Subervi shows proficiency on hard courts, winning 61% (W/L 138/88). Conversely, Subervi struggles on grass, without securing any wins.
Regarding the level of opponents faced, Kingsley and Subervi have competed against average opponents ranked 169.04 and 163.68, respectively. Despite the small difference, Subervi has generally faced tougher competition, potentially honing their competitive edge.
In tournaments, Kingsley usually competes at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, winning 59.38% of those matchups (W/L 19/13). Comparatively, Subervi boasts an even better performance, winning 80.56% (W/L 29/7), highlighting their capability at this competition level.
Set performance, particularly in deciding sets, marks another area of parity. Both Kingsley and Subervi have captured 50% of deciding sets in the past year, suggesting a closely contested battle if the match extends.
Reflecting on break point opportunities, Subervi displays a superior conversion rate, capitalizing on 45.68% of break chances compared to Kingsley’s 31.33%. This proficiency in breakpoint situations might favor Subervi in tightly contested games.
Considering these comprehensive analyses, Subervi seems to have a slight statistical edge. Especially given their higher match win percentage, adeptness on their preferred surface, and efficiency in converting break points, Subervi appears poised to emerge victorious in the upcoming encounter.
Subervi vs Kingsley Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Gavin Goode
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
12
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
2
94%
(
32 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Jodar
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cannon Kingsley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Antonio Serrano Luis
Player
Cannon Kingsley
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Victor Lilov
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve %
36%
(
10 of
28)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
52%
(
17 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
36
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Maximus Dussault
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Cannon Kingsley
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Robin Catry
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Seita Watanabe
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Cannon Kingsley
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
0
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
64%
(
28 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (315/224) | Win/Loss | 58% (129/94) |
| 56% (710/550) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (289/221) |
| 53% (6140/5427) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2605/2231) |
| 61% (138/88) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (57/46) |
| 58% (163/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (34/21) |
| 42% (14/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (38/27) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 854 | Aces Total | 1251 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1434 | Total Double Faults | 424 |
| 1:26:53 | Average Match Time | 1:31:35 |
| 498.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 432.22 |
| 61% (18068/29505) | 1st Serve % | 62% (8488/13698) |
| 66% (11923/18068) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (6073/8488) |
| 48% (5509/11437) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2705/5209) |
| 47% (1642/3524) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (538/1315) |
| 44% (13134/29930) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5356/13685) |
| 0% (0/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 27% (4/11) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 42% (83/113) | Challenger W/L | 47% (37/41) |
| 71% (228/91) | Futures W/L | 64% (92/51) |
| 59% (307/524) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (127/220) |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (62/136) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (24/62) |
| 55% (99/180) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (34/67) |
| 85% (298/253) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (128/112) |
| 15% (298/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (128/16) |
| 25% (241/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (95/17) |
Subervi vs. Kingsley Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
