A. Shah
To Win
R. Peniston
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W LForm
W W L W L L L W W WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Subervi winning 2 and Shah winning 0. The last match between Subervi and Shah was at the M25 Santo Domingo, 07-06-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Hard, with Roberto Cid Subervi getting the victory 6-2 3-0 ret..
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Roberto Cid Subervi | 1 |
Aryan Shah | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Santo Domingo(07-06-2025)
Subervi | Stats | Shah |
---|---|---|
73% (22-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (27-15) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
327 | Ranking | 489 |
211 | Highest Rank | 445 |
31 | Age | 19 |
R | Plays | - |
16 | Titles | 2 |
59% (325-226) | Career Total W/L | 65% (77-42) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
3 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
17 Jul 2025 / Second
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
16 Jul 2025 / Second
European Open - Hamburg wta
16 Jul 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 3-0 ret. |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Aryan Shah
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
42
Total Points Won
22
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
9 | Games Won | 2 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
0:53:26 | Average Match Time | 0:53:26 |
63% (17/27) | 1st Serve % | 46% (17/37) |
82% (14/17) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (11/17) |
60% (6/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (4/20) |
57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
59% (22/37) | Return Points Win % | 26% (7/27) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing both players' performances over recent months, we notice distinct edges in certain areas that could influence this upcoming match. Subervi consistently performs slightly better in second serve points and returns, suggesting a solid defensive and offensive base.
Moreover, Subervi's success under pressure, with higher breakpoint save rates and conversions, indicates resilience in crucial scenarios. This capacity to perform under duress is essential in tight matches.
Shah exhibits strength in deciding sets, which could be advantageous if the match is closely contested. However, Subervi's slightly superior overall performance rate and higher competition level exposure hint at a more formidable contender.
Based on current statistics and trends, Subervi appears more likely to clinch victory in this match, harnessing their strengths in critical game aspects and maintaining composure when under pressure.
Subervi vs Shah Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Masur
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Moerani Bouzige
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
31
Total Points Won
20
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Garrett Johns
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Roan Jones
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Nicolas Arseneault
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Aryan Shah
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
42
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aryan Shah
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Aryan Shah
Player
Daniil Glinka
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Aryan Shah
Player
John Echeverria
41%
(
21 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Aryan Shah
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lucas Gerch
Player
Aryan Shah
52%
(
51 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 6-7(5) 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Aryan Shah
100%
(
1 of
1)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
0)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
0%
(
0 of
1)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Rtn Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0
Total Points Won
1
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aryan Shah
Player
William Hsieh
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Aryan Shah
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
42
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (325/226) | Win/Loss | 65% (77/42) |
57% (731/555) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (163/101) |
53% (6286/5523) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (1311/1064) |
63% (148/88) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (68/34) |
58% (163/118) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) |
42% (14/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) |
0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
893 | Aces Total | 254 |
0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
1451 | Total Double Faults | 313 |
1:27:20 | Average Match Time | 1:29:6 |
503.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 411.17 |
61% (18508/30181) | 1st Serve % | 57% (3839/6711) |
66% (12219/18508) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2625/3839) |
48% (5640/11673) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1440/2872) |
46% (1688/3638) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (373/803) |
44% (13489/30695) | Return Points Win % | 43% (3009/6921) |
0% (0/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
27% (4/11) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
42% (83/114) | Challenger W/L | 58% (7/5) |
72% (238/92) | Futures W/L | 65% (70/37) |
59% (316/535) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (75/114) |
38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
46% (64/140) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (9/19) |
55% (100/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (20/30) |
85% (309/262) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (74/67) |
15% (309/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (74/7) |
26% (242/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (45/10) |