Roberto Cid Subervi vs Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Subervi vs Menendez-Maceiras analysis and find out who is favored!
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Subervi has won 50.93% of points on his second serve, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Subervi, in recent form, has won 58.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.4% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Subervi has saved 55.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Menendez-Maceiras has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Subervi has won 71.23% of matches played (W/L 52/ 21), with Menendez-Maceiras winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Subervi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 118/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Menendez-Maceiras has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 319/ 210), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 14/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Subervi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.67% of matches (W/L 46/ 14), where as Menendez-Maceiras has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Subervi winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Subervi winning 0 and Menendez-Maceiras winning 4. The last match between Subervi and Menendez-Maceiras was at the Puerto Vallarta Challenger, 03-05-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with Adrian Menendez-Maceiras getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:5.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Subervi and Menendez-Maceiras have played a deciding set 0 times, with Subervi winning 0 times and Menendez-Maceiras 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Subervi winning 0, and Menendez-Maceiras 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Subervi has played against opponents with an average rank of 206.58 while Menendez-Maceiras has played against players with an average rank of 144.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Subervi has won 76% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Subervi has converted 46.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Menendez-Maceiras has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Subervi 0 - 2 Menendez-Maceiras
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
396
Rank
211
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
865
Rank
111
High
38
Age
R
Plays
13
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Form
57% (276-205)
Career Total W/L
55% (608-500)
70% (19-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$504,829
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Subervi VS Menendez-Maceiras H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
Games Won | 16 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:37:5 | 1:37:5 |
1st Serve % | 57% (94/165) | 65% (72/110) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (58/94) | 76% (55/72) |
2nd Serve Win% | 46% (33/71) | 66% (25/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 37% (7/19) |
Return Points W% | 27% (30/110) | 45% (74/165) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Subervi VS Menendez-Maceiras H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-6(6) |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
6-1 7-5 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 70% (19/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 63% (40/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (319/240) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.11 | 0 |
Aces Total | 30 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
DFs Total | 65 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:54:2 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 262.19 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (1205/1743) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (806/1205) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (269/538) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (109/228) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 46% (820/1800) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 76% (13/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (19/27) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Benjamin Lock
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
14
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Stefan Kozlov
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Keegan Smith
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Aidan Mayo
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Peter Bertran
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
51%
(
62 of
121)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
35 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Stuart Parker
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
3
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Skander Mansouri
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
0
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Matthew William Donald
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more