Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Robert Farah vs Peter Torebko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Farah vs Torebko analysis and find out who is favored!
Robert Farah vs Peter Torebko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Farah has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Torebko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Farah, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Torebko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Farah has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Torebko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Farah has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Torebko winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Farah has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 58/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3). Torebko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 367/ 229), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Farah winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Farah winning 3 and Torebko winning 2. The last match between Farah and Torebko was at the Wimbledon - London, 19-06-2012, Q2 round, Grass with Peter Torebko getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:51:47.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Farah and Torebko have played a deciding set 1 times, with Farah winning 0 times and Torebko 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Farah winning 1, and Torebko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Farah has played against opponents with an average rank of while Torebko has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Farah has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Torebko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Farah has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Torebko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Farah 1 - 1 Torebko
Ret.
Rank
163
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
Ret.
Rank
182
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
53% (120-105)
Career Total W/L
59% (497-346)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$112,083
Career Prize Money
$28,860
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Robert Farah | Peter Torebko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 28 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:51:47 | 0:51:47 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (31/63) | 54% (40/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (22/31) | 57% (23/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (19/32) | 38% (13/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (38/74) | 35% (22/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Robert Farah
Player
Peter Torebko
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Robert Farah | Peter Torebko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Robert Farah Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Robert Farah
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Robert Farah
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Farah
Player
Kevin Kim
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
55 of
108)
18
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Robert Farah
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Robert Farah
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Robert Farah
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robert Farah
Player
Ryan Sweeting
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Robert Farah
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Torebko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Peter Torebko
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Peter Torebko
92%
(
35 of
38)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
8
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(1) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
view more
Farah Vs Torebko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
