R. Noguchi
To Win
L. Draxl
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L L W WForm
W L W W L W L W L WThey have played 7 sets in total, with Noguchi winning 3 and Jubb winning 4. The last match between Noguchi and Jubb was at the Little Rock Challenger, 29-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Rio Noguchi getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Rio Noguchi | 1 |
Paul Jubb | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Little Rock Challenger(29-05-2025)
Noguchi | Stats | Jubb |
---|---|---|
63% (25-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (13-16) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
222 | Ranking | 422 |
201 | Highest Rank | 180 |
26 | Age | 25 |
R | Plays | R |
9 | Titles | 11 |
59% (353-243) | Career Total W/L | 67% (231-116) |
$132,865 | Career Prize Money | $200,960 |
1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
- / Quarterfinals
10 Jul 2025 / Second
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
6-3 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Paul Jubb
Player
Rio Noguchi
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
7-6(2) 6-7(5) 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Paul Jubb
Player
Rio Noguchi
70%
(
88 of
125)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
52 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
111
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
3 | Sets Won | 4 |
35 | Games Won | 39 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 17 |
1:54:2 | Average Match Time | 1:54:2 |
61% (150/246) | 1st Serve % | 66% (164/249) |
62% (93/150) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (105/164) |
51% (49/96) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (41/85) |
47% (9/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (11/25) |
41% (103/249) | Return Points Win % | 42% (104/246) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing recent performance metrics, both Paul Jubb and Renta Noguchi exhibit strengths and weaknesses that could influence the outcome of their upcoming encounter. Jubb's slight edge in second serve points and pressure handling underlines his tactical advantage, particularly in tight situations.
Noguchi, however, counters with a marginally better return of second serve statistic and resilience in deciding sets. Yet, facing Jubb's historical dominance in head-to-head matchups tends to weigh considerably towards Jubb.
Factoring in surface preferences and opponent quality further enriches the analysis. While Noguchi enjoys success on grass, the match is not on his preferred surface this time. Additionally, Jubb's experience against tougher opponents potentially primes him for elevated performance.
With comprehensive analysis of these factors, Paul Jubb is likely to secure the win in the impending match, given his all-around proficiency and past triumphs over Renta Noguchi.
Noguchi vs Jubb Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Nicolas Arseneault
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Andre Ilagan
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Rio Noguchi
48%
(
46 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yi Zhou
Player
Rio Noguchi
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
6
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Patrick Kypson
Player
Rio Noguchi
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Paul Jubb
Player
Leandro Riedi
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
2
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Paul Jubb
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jan Choinski
Player
Paul Jubb
68%
(
77 of
114)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
109
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Paul Jubb
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Marin Cilic
Player
Paul Jubb
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Paul Jubb
Player
Giles Hussey
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (353/243) | Win/Loss | 67% (231/116) |
57% (756/568) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (513/295) |
53% (6460/5661) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (4241/3480) |
62% (248/155) | Hard Win/Loss | 70% (122/53) |
51% (65/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 72% (57/22) |
58% (19/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (30/22) |
64% (21/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (22/19) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
632 | Aces Total | 1104 |
0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
869 | Total Double Faults | 1034 |
1:17:41 | Average Match Time | 1:36:30 |
244.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 389.37 |
66% (21068/31847) | 1st Serve % | 62% (14031/22620) |
65% (13762/21068) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (9761/14031) |
50% (5402/10779) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4500/8589) |
45% (1574/3488) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1033/2493) |
42% (13730/32831) | Return Points Win % | 41% (9718/23529) |
40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 36% (5/9) |
56% (5/4) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (10/6) |
48% (86/94) | Challenger W/L | 53% (66/58) |
65% (260/142) | Futures W/L | 78% (150/43) |
59% (347/590) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (228/338) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
50% (64/127) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (68/115) |
59% (79/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (62/111) |
92% (321/296) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (224/201) |
8% (321/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (224/22) |
20% (274/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (123/30) |