S. Shimabukuro
To Win
C. Langmo
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W L L WForm
L L W W L L L L W LThey have played 5 sets in total, with Noguchi winning 2 and Langmo winning 3. The last match between Noguchi and Langmo was at the Tyler Challenger, 02-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Rio Noguchi getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-0.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Rio Noguchi | 1 |
Christian Langmo | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tyler Challenger(02-06-2025)
Noguchi | Stats | Langmo |
---|---|---|
62% (24-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (24-15) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
222 | Ranking | 341 |
201 | Highest Rank | 318 |
26 | Age | 29 |
R | Plays | R |
9 | Titles | 6 |
59% (352-243) | Career Total W/L | 58% (251-184) |
$132,865 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
09 Jul 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-2 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
6
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
7-6(5) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Rio Noguchi
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
77%
(
53 of
69)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
2 | Sets Won | 3 |
25 | Games Won | 21 |
9 | Aces (Total) | 20 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
1:45:15 | Average Match Time | 1:45:15 |
71% (94/133) | 1st Serve % | 65% (93/143) |
77% (72/94) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (68/93) |
49% (19/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (22/50) |
50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
37% (53/143) | Return Points Win % | 32% (42/133) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the recent performance stats, Langmo demonstrates a stronger second serve game, which could be pivotal in maintaining control during his service games. Noguchi, however, showcases a superior return game that may challenge Langmo's service capabilities.
Under pressure, Langmo reveals resilience with a higher breakpoint save percentage, hinting at important mental toughness during critical moments. Nonetheless, Noguchi's aptitude in converting breakpoints offers him an advantage when scoring opportunities arise.
Despite Noguchi facing marginally tougher opponents, Langmo has the historical edge with a past victory in their lone encounter. Furthermore, his proficiency in deciding sets could prove decisive if the match escalates in intensity.
Given these insights, Langmo appears to hold a slight advantage heading into the match, suggesting he is the more likely contender to emerge victorious based on the presented data.
Noguchi vs Langmo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Andre Ilagan
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Rio Noguchi
48%
(
46 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yi Zhou
Player
Rio Noguchi
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
6
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Patrick Kypson
Player
Rio Noguchi
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Yi Zhou
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Keegan Rice
Player
Christian Langmo
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Mikael Arseneault
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rio Noguchi
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
6
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Zheng
Player
Christian Langmo
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Christian Langmo
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Omar Jasika
Player
Christian Langmo
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
11
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Ajeet Rai
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
9
Aces
8
10
Double Faults
6
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
36%
(
17 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
41 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Yaojie Zeng
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
10
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (352/243) | Win/Loss | 58% (251/184) |
57% (754/568) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (562/441) |
53% (6447/5654) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5057/4714) |
61% (247/155) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (203/139) |
51% (65/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (41/39) |
58% (19/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) |
64% (21/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.58 |
631 | Aces Total | 2784 |
0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
867 | Total Double Faults | 1217 |
1:17:40 | Average Match Time | 1:32:38 |
442.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.09 |
66% (21022/31782) | 1st Serve % | 63% (16447/26239) |
65% (13731/21022) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (12118/16447) |
50% (5392/10760) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4890/9792) |
45% (1569/3476) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (879/2310) |
42% (13694/32757) | Return Points Win % | 37% (9790/26692) |
40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
56% (5/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
47% (85/94) | Challenger W/L | 48% (67/72) |
65% (260/142) | Futures W/L | 62% (184/112) |
59% (346/589) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (248/427) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
50% (64/127) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (82/147) |
59% (79/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (77/138) |
92% (320/295) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (238/204) |
8% (320/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (238/34) |
20% (274/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (196/47) |