Rik De Voest vs Greg Jones Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Voest vs Jones analysis and find out who is favored!
Rik De Voest vs Greg Jones Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Voest has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jones has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Voest, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jones has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Voest has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jones has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Voest has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jones winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Voest has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jones has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Voest has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jones has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Voest has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jones has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Voest 0 - 0 Jones
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Rik De Voest Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Rik de Voest
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
70 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF | 7-5 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Luke Saville
Player
Rik de Voest
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Rik de Voest
Player
Karol Beck
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Min-Hyoek Cho
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Greg Jones Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Alexander Babanine
Player
Greg Jones
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
44 of
92)
6
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
8
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
38 of
44)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Greg Jones
55%
(
56 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
85 of
118)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
85)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Alexander Ward
Player
Greg Jones
44%
(
26 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Greg Jones
Player
Lucas Gomez
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
21
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Greg Jones
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Tim Smyczek
Player
Greg Jones
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Greg Jones
Player
Nick Chappell
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Conor Berg
Player
Greg Jones
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
8
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
56 of
77)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
120)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(1) 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
John Lamble
Player
Greg Jones
44%
(
35 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Greg Jones
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more