Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Richel Hogenkamp vs Sabine Lisicki Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hogenkamp vs Lisicki analysis and find out who is favored!
Richel Hogenkamp vs Sabine Lisicki Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hogenkamp has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lisicki has won 46.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hogenkamp, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lisicki has won 52.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hogenkamp has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lisicki has saved 67.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hogenkamp has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lisicki winning 57.14% (W/L 8/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hogenkamp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 215/ 132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19). Lisicki has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 52/ 29), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 146/ 128).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hogenkamp winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hogenkamp winning 1 and Lisicki winning 2. The last match between Hogenkamp and Lisicki was at the Engie Open de Limoges - Limoges, 07-11-2017, First, I.hard with Sabine Lisicki getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:5.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hogenkamp and Lisicki have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hogenkamp winning 0 times and Lisicki 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hogenkamp winning 0, and Lisicki 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hogenkamp has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lisicki has played against players with an average rank of 289.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hogenkamp has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lisicki has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hogenkamp has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lisicki has converted 57.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hogenkamp 0 - 1 Lisicki
896
Rank
94
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
420
Rank
12
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
59% (414-282)
Career Total W/L
56% (340-264)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$542,444
Career Prize Money
$4,519,871
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Richel Hogenkamp | Sabine Lisicki |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 17 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:5 | 2:0:5 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (65/119) | 49% (47/95) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (41/65) | 68% (32/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (24/54) | 38% (18/48) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (45/95) | 45% (54/119) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 2-6 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
49%
(
47 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
65 of
119)
11
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
119)
104
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Richel Hogenkamp | Sabine Lisicki |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Richel Hogenkamp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Christina Rosca
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Salma Djoubri
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sabine Lisicki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nigina Abduraimova
Player
Sabine Lisicki
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
7
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Stacey Fung
50%
(
53 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(2) 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Liv Hovde
48%
(
44 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
58 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
17
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
10
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Katarina Jokic
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
46 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Simona Waltert
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
7
Aces
6
16
Double Faults
10
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
48 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Maia Lumsden
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Sabine Lisicki
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
40%
(
34 of
84)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
11
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Hogenkamp Vs Lisicki Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
