Richel Hogenkamp vs Maja Chwalinska Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hogenkamp vs Chwalinska analysis and find out who is favored!
Richel Hogenkamp vs Maja Chwalinska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hogenkamp has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Chwalinska has won 49.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hogenkamp, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chwalinska has won 57.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 44.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hogenkamp has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chwalinska has saved 48.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hogenkamp has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chwalinska winning 55% (W/L 33/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hogenkamp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 215/ 132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19). Chwalinska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 106/ 45), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 31/ 23).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hogenkamp winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hogenkamp winning 2 and Chwalinska winning 1. The last match between Hogenkamp and Chwalinska was at the Saguenay, 22-10-2018, First, I.hard with Richel Hogenkamp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hogenkamp and Chwalinska have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hogenkamp winning 1 times and Chwalinska 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hogenkamp winning 1, and Chwalinska 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hogenkamp has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chwalinska has played against players with an average rank of 280.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hogenkamp has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chwalinska has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hogenkamp has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chwalinska has converted 54.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hogenkamp 1 - 0 Chwalinska
16
Total
0
Mast
12
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
896
Rank
94
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
296
Rank
149
High
22
Age
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (414-282)
Career Total W/L
65% (183-97)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$542,444
Career Prize Money
$191,800
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hogenkamp VS Chwalinska H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Richel Hogenkamp | Maja Chwalinska |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 17 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 3:4:0 | 3:4:0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (54/90) | 77% (106/137) |
1st Serve Win% | 54% (29/54) | 56% (59/106) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (18/36) | 29% (9/31) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (8/20) | 50% (7/14) |
Return Points W% | 50% (69/137) | 48% (43/90) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Hogenkamp VS Chwalinska H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Maja Chwalinska
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
77%
(
106 of
137)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
59 of
106)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
43 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
69 of
137)
116
Total Points Won
111
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Richel Hogenkamp | Maja Chwalinska |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (28/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (246/213) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (8/5) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.04 |
Aces Total | 0 | 9 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.18 |
DFs Total | 0 | 41 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 289.14 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 71% (1047/1466) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (605/1047) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (208/419) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 51% (102/199) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (750/1563) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/9) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (12/9) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (12/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (9/3) |
Richel Hogenkamp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yuki Naito
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Carol Zhao
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Christina Rosca
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Salma Djoubri
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Maja Chwalinska Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Maja Chwalinska
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
9
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(5) 6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
54 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Carole Monnet
Player
Maja Chwalinska
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
49%
(
34 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Jennifer Ruggeri
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ipek Oz
Player
Maja Chwalinska
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Victoria Bervid
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
36%
(
21 of
58)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Maja Chwalinska
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sinja Kraus
Player
Maja Chwalinska
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
83 of
126)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
62 of
126)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Angelina Wirges
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H |
view more