D. Lajovic
To Win
T. Atmane
To Win
Richard Gasquet vs Terence Atmane Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L W L W L
Form
W L L L L W W L L LH2H: Gasquet 1 - 0 Atmane
They have played 4 sets in total, with Gasquet winning 3 and Atmane winning 1. The last match between Gasquet and Atmane was at the French Open - Paris, 26-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Richard Gasquet getting the victory 6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Richard Gasquet | 1 |
| Terence Atmane | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(26-05-2025)
Richard Gasquet
Terence Atmane
6
2
2
6
6
3
6
0
| Gasquet | Stats | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| 46% (6-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (23-21) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 182 | Ranking | 127 |
| 7 | Highest Rank | 118 |
| 39 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 26 | Titles | 9 |
| 62% (783-483) | Career Total W/L | 61% (227-145) |
| $13,404,600 | Career Prize Money | $363,910 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
21 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bejlek VS Uchijima PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
21 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Townsend VS Arango PREDICTION Hard
Mubadala Citi DC Open - Washington wta
20 Jul 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 20 | Games Won | 11 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:17:0 | Average Match Time | 2:17:0 |
| 59% (56/95) | 1st Serve % | 54% (61/114) |
| 70% (39/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (39/61) |
| 49% (19/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (19/53) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 49% (56/114) | Return Points Win % | 39% (37/95) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gasquet vs Atmane Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Atmane's recent second serve win rate is 46.62%, narrowly surpassing Gasquet's at 44.35%. Could this give Atmane an advantage?
- Return Game Stats: Gasquet excels in returning second serves, winning 48.65% compared to Atmane's 44.87%. Is this Gasquet's edge in the game?
- First Serve Return: Gasquet again leads slightly in first serve return stats with 24.9% against Atmane's 23.7%.
- Under Pressure: Atmane has a better breakpoint save rate at 63.25%, while Gasquet has managed 55% recently. How might this reflect during critical match moments?
- Overall Performance: Atmane has a stronger win percentage over the last year at 56.76% over Gasquet's 47.62%.
- Best Surface: Atmane's best performance is on Hard courts with a 65% win rate, while Gasquet is strongest on Grass with the same 65% win rate.
- Player Level: Gasquet has faced slightly tougher opponents with an average ranking of 201.38 compared to Atmane's 226.55.
- Deciding Sets: Both players have won 47% of their deciding sets, suggesting evenly matched performance when under final set pressure.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Atmane's breakpoint conversion rate is 33.13%, slightly ahead of Gasquet's 31.94%, hinting at a potential edge for capitalizing on serve breaks.
Editorial Prediction (May 26, 2025, UTC):
With a higher recent win percentage and an advantageous performance on Hard courts, Atmane shows strengths coming into this match. His better second serve and breakpoint statistics could prove pivotal.
Gasquet, however, demonstrates superior return skills, particularly against second serves, which could pose a challenge to Atmane. His experience on the tour with slightly stronger opposition further balances this contest.
While both players share an evenly matched ability to handle deciding sets, the slight overall statistical advantages favor Atmane as the likely winner in this upcoming match, assuming current trends hold.
Gasquet vs Atmane Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Richard Gasquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Richard Gasquet
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Richard Gasquet
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
37%
(
18 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Richard Gasquet
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Terence Atmane
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
10
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Arthur Fery
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
33 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Terence Atmane
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (783/483) | Win/Loss | 61% (227/145) |
| 59% (1888/1292) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (517/362) |
| 53% (16339/14324) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4537/4064) |
| 60% (256/168) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (177/94) |
| 63% (251/146) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (37/30) |
| 61% (192/124) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (9/13) |
| 65% (84/45) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.51 |
| 5583 | Aces Total | 2137 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 2544 | Total Double Faults | 1254 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 447.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 376.06 |
| 61% (48452/79346) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15756/26458) |
| 73% (35276/48452) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (11344/15756) |
| 53% (16344/30923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5594/10702) |
| 41% (3041/7489) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (966/2258) |
| 38% (30616/80572) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9833/25932) |
| 61% (124/79) | Slam W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 56% (157/122) | Masters W/L | 57% (12/9) |
| 62% (23/14) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (357/210) | Main Tour W/L | 42% (11/15) |
| 17% (1/5) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (120/52) | Challenger W/L | 62% (92/56) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 65% (106/56) |
| 63% (647/1034) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (223/363) |
| 61% (133/219) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 56% (280/503) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (88/151) |
| 57% (202/356) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (72/136) |
| 87% (747/653) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (233/199) |
| 12% (747/92) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (233/34) |
| 25% (519/130) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (138/28) |
Gasquet vs. Atmane Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
