Richard Gasquet vs Charles Broom Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L W L L W
Form
W L W L L L L L L LHead-to-head: Gasquet 1 - 0 Broom
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gasquet winning 2 and Broom winning 0. The last match between Gasquet and Broom was at the Pau Challenger, 19-02-2025, First, I.hard with Richard Gasquet getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
Pau Challenger(19-02-2025)
6
3
7
6
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Lamens VS Uchijima PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Kartal VS Townsend PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Richard Gasquet
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
13
Games Won
9
11
Aces (Total)
11
1
Total Double Faults
0
1:36:6
Average Match Time
1:36:6
61% (47/77)
1st Serve %
67% (45/67)
77% (36/47)
1st Serve Win %
69% (31/45)
57% (17/30)
2nd Serve Win %
59% (13/22)
22% (2/9)
Break Points Won % (Total)
13% (1/8)
34% (23/67)
Return Points Win %
31% (24/77)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Richard Gasquet vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Richard Gasquet 1 - 0 Charles Broom
Analysis of the upcoming tennis match reveals valuable insights that can assist in predicting the outcome. Let us delve into the crucial factors that contribute to this match's potential:
- Second serve performance - Recent form: Examining the past six months, both Gasquet and Broom have showcased commendable prowess in their second serve, with success rates of 50.23% and 50.31% respectively. Notably, there exists a strong correlation between this statistical attribute and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return game statistics - Recent form: Focusing on their recent performances, Gasquet has proven adept at winning 51.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Broom has demonstrated even greater proficiency by securing 56.44% of such points. An analogous trend is observed in first serve returns, with figures of 27.99% and 27.06% for Gasquet and Broom respectively. These impressive return statistics play a significant role in determining the favored contender in their head-to-head matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Assessing their ability to handle pressure situations, Gasquet has successfully saved 61.74% of breakpoints in recent form. Broom, while still commendable, has saved a slightly lower percentage at 55.24%. This valuable statistic bears significant relevance for accurate in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: A comprehensive review of their performances over the past year indicates Gasquet's success rate of 49.15% in matches played (29 wins and 30 losses). Conversely, Broom demonstrates a slightly more favorable record with a success rate of 52.31% (34 wins and 31 losses). These figures provide an overall glimpse into their head-to-head prediction overview.
- Optimal playing surface: Considering their individual career statistics, Gasquet has exhibited exceptional proficiency on grass courts, achieving a remarkable 65% win rate (84 wins and 45 losses). Conversely, their performance on hard courts shows a slightly lower success rate of 60% (256 wins and 168 losses). Meanwhile, Broom excels on clay courts, with an impressive win rate of 67% (44 wins and 22 losses). However, their performance on grass courts is comparatively weaker, with a success rate of 57% (25 wins and 19 losses).
- Player level: Analyzing their match history over the past year, Gasquet primarily competed on the main tour, securing victory in 39.13% of matches played (9 wins and 14 losses). In contrast, Broom participated in a majority of their matches in the Challenger/ITF tournaments with a prize pool greater than $10K, triumphing in 43.33% of their matches (13 wins and 17 losses). When comparing these statistics to predict the favorite, it is essential to consider the relative event level at which these players have been performing.
- Opponent quality statistics: Over the previous 12 months, Gasquet has faced opponents with an average rank of 209.47, indicating a reasonably competitive field. Broom, on the other hand, has encountered players with an average rank of 378.62, underscoring the challenging nature of their opponents.
- Deciding set performance in all matches: For those interested in live predictions and betting, should this match extend into a deciding set, Gasquet has proven adept, winning 44% of deciding sets over the past year. Broom boasts a marginally higher success rate, triumphing in 47% of matches played on the tour.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performance remains a valuable indicator for predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider the current event statistics, which provide insight into the form of the players. These statistics can be found in the section below (if applicable to the players' participation in the current event). Additionally, certain players may exhibit enhanced performance at specific events, necessitating their consideration when prognosticating the match outcome.
- Break point conversion: Recent form indicates that Gasquet possesses a break point conversion rate of 43.85%, while Broom boasts a slightly lower rate at 38.42%. This significant statistic proves invaluable for in-game live betting, particularly when either player finds themselves in a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you seek detailed models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it is worth noting that it particularly appeals to statistics enthusiasts.
Richard Gasquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Richard Gasquet
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
28 of
62)
13
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Richard Gasquet
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
18
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Adrian Mannarino
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Duje Ajdukovic
Player
Richard Gasquet
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Richard Gasquet
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Derek Pham
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Richard Gasquet
79%
(
98 of
124)
1st Serve %
59%
(
74 of
125)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
39 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
42 of
125)
127
Total Points Won
122
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
14
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
49 of
55)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
52 of
63)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
21 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Charles Broom
67%
(
69 of
103)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
129)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
65 of
88)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
44 of
129)
116
Total Points Won
116
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Charles Broom
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
13
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 0-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Duda
Player
Charles Broom
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Charles Broom
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
28 of
62)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
James Story
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
62% (780/480)
Win/Loss
61% (226/144)
59% (1879/1282)
Sets Win/Loss
59% (511/360)
53% (16254/14236)
Games Win/Loss
54% (4418/3818)
60% (256/168)
Hard Win/Loss
63% (96/56)
63% (248/143)
Clay Win/Loss
67% (44/22)
61% (192/124)
Indoor Hard W/L
56% (61/47)
65% (84/45)
Grass Win/Loss
57% (25/19)
0.37
Aces Per Game
0.39
5573
Aces Total
1563
0.17
Double Faults Per Game
0.23
2522
Total Double Faults
920
1:4:39
Average Match Time
1:25:35
442.47
Average Opponent Rank
389.82
61% (48134/78798)
1st Serve %
62% (13060/21202)
73% (35070/48134)
1st Serve Win %
70% (9147/13060)
53% (16232/30693)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (4063/8141)
41% (3013/7424)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (934/2292)
38% (30382/80009)
Return Points Win %
41% (9132/22438)
61% (123/78)
Slam W/L
25% (1/3)
56% (156/121)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
62% (23/14)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
63% (356/209)
Main Tour W/L
20% (1/4)
17% (1/5)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
70% (120/52)
Challenger W/L
44% (44/55)
0% (0/0)
Futures W/L
69% (180/82)
63% (645/1030)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
61% (224/367)
61% (132/217)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
56% (280/503)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (58/115)
57% (200/352)
Deciding Set Win %
54% (70/130)
87% (745/651)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (218/187)
12% (745/92)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (218/31)
25% (515/129)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
26% (152/39)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
