Richard Gasquet vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L L W W L W L W L
Form
L L W L W L W L L LHead-To-Head: Gasquet 1 - 2 Zandschulp
They have played 10 sets in total, with Gasquet winning 4 and Zandschulp winning 6. The last match between Gasquet and Zandschulp was at the Tiriac Open - Bucharest, 31-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Richard Gasquet getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Richard Gasquet | 1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tiriac Open - Bucharest(31-03-2025)
Gasquet | Stats | Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
46% (6-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (10-15) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
171 | Ranking | 91 |
7 | Highest Rank | 22 |
38 | Age | 29 |
R | Plays | R |
26 | Titles | 7 |
62% (783-483) | Career Total W/L | 61% (363-229) |
$13,404,600 | Career Prize Money | $3,456,920 |
0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
Humbert VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
Gasquet VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 7-5 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
7-5 2-6 7-6(7) 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Richard Gasquet
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
59%
(
79 of
134)
20
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
9
85%
(
60 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
31%
(
35 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
54 of
134)
133
Total Points Won
115
|
||||
4-6 6-0 4-0 ret. |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Richard Gasquet
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
16
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
57
|
Gasquet VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
4 | Sets Won | 6 |
41 | Games Won | 48 |
12 | Aces (Total) | 41 |
12 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
2:7:32 | Average Match Time | 2:7:32 |
62% (193/312) | 1st Serve % | 63% (166/264) |
62% (120/193) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (125/166) |
50% (59/119) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (45/98) |
42% (11/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (14/33) |
36% (94/264) | Return Points Win % | 43% (133/312) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gasquet vs Zandschulp Match Preview :
In analyzing the upcoming tennis match, we focus on performance metrics to determine the favored player. Over the past year, Zandschulp has achieved a win-loss record of 51.47% with 35 wins and 33 losses, while Gasquet stands at an even 50% with 25 wins and 25 losses. When considering the best surfaces, Zandschulp exhibits a 63% win rate on indoor hard courts, whereas Gasquet has excelled on grass with a 65% win rate.
Looking at their second serve performance over the last six months, Gasquet leads slightly by winning 46.21% of points compared to Zandschulp's 44.21%. Furthermore, in return games, Zandschulp has won 46.49% of points on opponents' second serves, edging out Gasquet who managed 45.5%. When it comes to first serve returns, Zandschulp again surpasses Gasquet with 27.37% compared to 21.25%, offering insight into who might be favored in head-to-head encounters.
Examining pressure situations, Zandschulp has saved 51.22% of breakpoints in recent form, slightly lagging behind Gasquet's 56.44%. In terms of breakpoint conversion, Zandschulp has a conversion rate of 28.37%, while Gasquet improves slightly with 29.03%. These statistics provide valuable tips for in-game betting, especially when either player faces or capitalizes on breakpoint opportunities.
Diving into direct head-to-head encounters, Zandschulp has won both previous matches against Gasquet, claiming five sets to Gasquet's two. The last encounter saw Zandschulp victorious in a Wimbledon match with a scoreline of 7-5, 2-6, 7-6(7), 6-1. The average match time between them is two hours and one minute, hinting at potentially lengthy contests.
Regarding opponent quality, Zandschulp has faced players with an average ranking of 137.24 over the past year, higher than Gasquet's 207.2, which might influence predictions since facing tougher opponents typically hones performance. In deciding sets, Gasquet edges ahead with a 50% win rate compared to Zandschulp's 48% over the past 12 months, an essential stat if the match stretches to this length.
Although both players have comparable skills in various aspects, Zandschulp holds a slight advantage given his recent head-to-head success and superior return game statistics. However, Gasquet's experience and consistency in break point situations cannot be overlooked. Considering all factors, the match is predicted to be competitive, but Zandschulp is likely to emerge victorious based on the available statistics.
Gasquet vs Zandschulp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Richard Gasquet Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jannik Sinner
Player
Richard Gasquet
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Richard Gasquet
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
37%
(
18 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Richard Gasquet
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Richard Gasquet
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Richard Gasquet
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emilio Nava
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
83 of
122)
1st Serve %
50%
(
63 of
125)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
44 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
57 of
125)
135
Total Points Won
112
|
6-2 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (783/483) | Win/Loss | 61% (363/229) |
59% (1888/1292) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (828/596) |
53% (16339/14324) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7136/6319) |
60% (256/168) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (68/49) |
63% (251/146) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (170/107) |
61% (192/124) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (114/60) |
65% (84/45) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (11/13) |
0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
5583 | Aces Total | 2894 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
2544 | Total Double Faults | 2150 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:35:47 |
445.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 394.24 |
61% (48452/79346) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24150/39247) |
73% (35276/48452) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17255/24150) |
53% (16344/30923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7266/15100) |
41% (3041/7489) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1783/4137) |
38% (30616/80572) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16425/40418) |
61% (124/79) | Slam W/L | 60% (32/21) |
56% (157/122) | Masters W/L | 49% (26/27) |
62% (23/14) | Cups W/L | 63% (12/7) |
63% (357/210) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (66/65) |
17% (1/5) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
70% (120/52) | Challenger W/L | 63% (72/42) |
0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 70% (155/67) |
63% (647/1034) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (336/539) |
61% (133/219) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (20/40) |
56% (280/503) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (100/183) |
57% (202/356) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (112/195) |
87% (747/653) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (342/303) |
12% (747/92) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (342/38) |
25% (519/130) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (248/59) |
Gasquet vs. Zandschulp Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions
- Loading news...