Ricardas Berankis vs Rik De Voest Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Berankis vs Voest analysis and find out who is favored!
Ricardas Berankis vs Rik De Voest Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Berankis has won 50.3% of points on his second serve, while Voest has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Berankis, in recent form, has won 53.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Voest has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.39% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Berankis has saved 62.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Voest has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Berankis has won 50% of matches played (W/L 23/ 23), with Voest winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Berankis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 218/ 107), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 66/ 65). Voest has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Berankis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.22% of matches (W/L 17/ 19), where as Voest has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Berankis has played against opponents with an average rank of 322.09 while Voest has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Berankis has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Voest has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Berankis has converted 38.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Voest has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Berankis 0 - 0 Voest
15
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ricardas Berankis | Rik De Voest |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 61% (11/7) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 53% (24/21) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (226/213) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (10/6) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.28 | N/A |
Aces Total | 60 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.19 | N/A |
DFs Total | 40 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:32:8 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 229.83 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 60% (741/1240) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 69% (513/741) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (251/499) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (49/127) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 39% (497/1271) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 56% (9/7) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (11/18) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | N/A |
Ricardas Berankis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ricardas Berankis
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
17
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Denis Yevseyev
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Ricardas Berankis
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Altug Celikbilek
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
53%
(
65 of
123)
3
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Hendrik Jebens
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
7
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
48 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Ricardas Berankis
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Ricardas Berankis
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Filip Peliwo
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Titouan Droguet
Player
Ricardas Berankis
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Henri Squire
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Rik De Voest Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Rik de Voest
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
70 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF | 7-5 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Luke Saville
Player
Rik de Voest
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Rik de Voest
Player
Karol Beck
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rik de Voest
Player
Min-Hyoek Cho
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more