Rhys Searant vs Mason Naumovski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Searant vs Naumovski analysis and find out who is favored!
Rhys Searant vs Mason Naumovski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Searant has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Naumovski has won 43.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Searant, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naumovski has won 52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Searant has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naumovski has saved 62.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Searant has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Naumovski winning 59.18% (W/L 29/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Searant has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Naumovski has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Searant has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Naumovski has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Searant winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Searant winning 2 and Naumovski winning 0. The last match between Searant and Naumovski was at the M25 Traralgon, 20-11-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Rhys Searant getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Searant and Naumovski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Searant winning 0 times and Naumovski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Searant winning 0, and Naumovski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Searant has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Naumovski has played against players with an average rank of 58.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Searant has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naumovski has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Searant has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naumovski has converted 43.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Searant 1 - 0 Naumovski
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
52% (33-31)
Career Total W/L
47% (53-59)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Rhys Searant | Mason Naumovski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Rhys Searant | Mason Naumovski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 57% (8/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 58% (19/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (28/29) | 52% (181/169) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 60% (3/2) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.33 |
Aces Total | 0 | 56 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.18 |
DFs Total | 0 | 31 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 31.71 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (306/490) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (233/306) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (81/184) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (18/43) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (179/484) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 62% (8/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 57% (8/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 67% (4/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 88% (8/7) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 13% (8/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Rhys Searant Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(9) 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Rhys Searant
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve %
90%
(
19 of
21)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
5 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
35
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rhys Searant
Player
Cade Birrell
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Rhys Searant
Player
Jayden Court
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Sam Oster
Player
Rhys Searant
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Derek Pham
Player
Rhys Searant
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Mason Naumovski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Leo Lagarrigue
Player
Mason Naumovski
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mason Naumovski
Player
Maxim Krapivin
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mason Naumovski
Player
Lucas Andriamasilalao
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Shintaro Imai
Player
Mason Naumovski
67%
(
74 of
110)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
14
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
41 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mason Naumovski
Player
Chase Ferguson
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
81%
(
56 of
69)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mason Naumovski
Player
Lawrence Sciglitano
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
14
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more