Remika Ohashi vs Tamara Kostic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W L W L L
Form
L L W L W W W L L LHead To Head: Ohashi 0 - 1 Kostic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ohashi winning 0 and Kostic winning 2. The last match between Ohashi and Kostic was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Tamara Kostic getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Remika Ohashi | 0 |
| Tamara Kostic | 1 |
W15 Sharm ElSheikh(19-02-2025)
6
3
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Popyrin VS Safiullin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
22 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Gauff VS Sakkari PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
22 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Tamara Kostic
Player
Remika Ohashi
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
4
Games Won
12
0
Aces (Total)
1
4
Total Double Faults
7
1:20:56
Average Match Time
1:20:56
75% (48/64)
1st Serve %
62% (33/53)
44% (21/48)
1st Serve Win %
73% (24/33)
38% (6/16)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (10/20)
50% (2/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (6/14)
36% (19/53)
Return Points Win %
58% (37/64)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Remika Ohashi vs Tamara Kostic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Remika Ohashi 0 - 1 Tamara Kostic
- Recent Form Analysis of Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Ohashi has demonstrated remarkable finesse during their second serves, having seized victory in an impressive 42.51% of points. Conversely, Kostic has exhibited a slightly lower success rate of 39.36%. This seemingly minute contrast bears significant weight, as it substantiates the notion that this statistic is closely intertwined with the accuracy of match predictions.
- Insights from Return Game Statistics: Recent return game statistics shed illuminating light on the prowess of Ohashi and Kostic. Ohashi's proficiency in returning their opponent's second serves has been exceptional, with a notable triumph rate of 58.12%. On the other hand, Kostic has secured victory in 49.38% of such points. Similarly, when it comes to first serve returns, Ohashi retains an advantage with a success rate reaching 41.48%, in comparison to Kostic's slightly inferior record of 37.84%. The significant correlation between these statistics and the favored contender within this head-to-head (H2H) encounter cannot be overlooked.
- Under Pressure Analysis: A crucial aspect to consider in in-game betting predictions is how players perform under pressure. Recent form indicates that Ohashi has exhibited the ability to defend against breakpoints splendidly, managing to save an impressive 53.19% of them. In contrast, Kostic has displayed a slightly lower proficiency, successfully rescuing 44.23% of breakpoints. This statistic serves as a valuable instrument for astute in-game betting predictions.
- An Overview of Performance: Ohashi has displayed remarkable prowess over the course of the previous year, capturing victories in 58.33% of matches played (W/L ratio of 21/15). Similarly, Kostic has proven their mettle, emerging triumphant in 53.85% of matches played (W/L ratio of 21/18). Taking these statistics into account provides us with a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
- Surface Dominance: Delving into the players' performance on different surfaces, Ohashi emerges as a formidable force on hard courts, capturing victory in an impressive 60% of matches played (W/L ratio of 21/14). However, their performance on indoor hard courts remains subpar, lacking victories altogether (W/L ratio of 0/1). Kostic, on the other hand, excels on hard courts, boasting a substantial win percentage of 72% (W/L ratio of 48/19), yet struggles on clay with a less impressive win percentage of 33% (W/L ratio of 11/22).
- Player Level Insights: Assessing the players' recent activity demonstrates that Ohashi has predominantly participated in tournaments classified as Futures/Satellites/ITF with a prize of $10K. Their commendable performance in these settings has garnered them victory in an impressive 70.37% of matches played (W/L ratio of 19/8). Conversely, Kostic has predominantly competed in tournaments classified as Challengers/ITF with prize money exceeding $10K, attaining victory in 60% of matches played (W/L ratio of 18/12). When examining these statistics to predict the favored contender, it becomes evident that their significance is contingent upon the tournament level at which the players have competed.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the course of the past twelve months, Ohashi has confronted opponents boasting an average rank of 320. Kostic, in turn, has grappled with adversaries holding an average rank of 380.26. These figures serve as a valuable analytical tool for discerning the caliber of competition each player has faced.
- Deciding Set Performance Versus All Players: For those yearning for riveting live predictions and thrilling betting opportunities when a match reaches a deciding set, it is worth noting that Ohashi has triumphed in an impressive 62% of such sets over the past twelve months. Kostic, however, demonstrates an even more formidable record, emerging triumphant in 75% of all matches played on tour. These statistics paint a vivid picture of the players' prowess during nail-biting, match-deciding moments.
- Current Event Head-to-Head (H2H) Stats: While past player performance assumes paramount importance in predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to account for current event stats. These provide a glimpse into a player's present form and their ability to contend. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to the section below in order to gain insights into the performances of Ohashi and Kostic during the current event. Additionally, some players exhibit a proclivity for excelling at specific events, and this aspect should not be overlooked when making outcome predictions.
- Break Point Conversion: An intriguing statistic to consider for in-game live betting tips is the ability of each player to convert break point opportunities. Ohashi has showcased commendable proficiency in this domain, successfully converting 53.95% of such opportunities. Meanwhile, Kostic possesses a slightly lower conversion rate, seizing victory in 51.28% of chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic holds great significance when evaluating potential outcomes during nail-biting moments.
- If you are an aficionado of models that gauge and predict tennis matches, it is highly recommended that you peruse this article. However, be duly warned that its content is tailored to appease the appetite of only the most ardent statistics enthusiasts.
Remika Ohashi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Remika Ohashi
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hayu Kinoshita
Player
Remika Ohashi
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Remika Ohashi
Player
Nagomi Higashitani
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
49%
(
42 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Remika Ohashi
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Remika Ohashi
Player
Ksenia Zaytseva
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Remika Ohashi
Player
Barbara Dessolis
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Remika Ohashi
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Remika Ohashi
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Kostic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Conny Perrin
Player
Tamara Kostic
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Tamara Kostic
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jana Kovackova
Player
Tamara Kostic
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
86%
(
32 of
37)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
37
Total Points Won
46
|
1-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
0
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Mavie Osterreicher
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Remika Ohashi
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Tamara Kostic
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Nicol Benesova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tamara Kostic
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Tamara Kostic
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
13
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
53% (24/21)
Win/Loss
59% (76/52)
52% (55/50)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (169/125)
51% (534/513)
Games Win/Loss
52% (1391/1292)
58% (23/17)
Hard Win/Loss
72% (51/20)
0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss
32% (11/23)
20% (1/4)
Indoor Hard W/L
61% (14/9)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.02
Aces Per Game
0.07
9
Aces Total
95
0.14
Double Faults Per Game
0.58
70
Total Double Faults
754
1:5:53
Average Match Time
1:28:25
403.47
Average Opponent Rank
396.66
73% (1460/2007)
1st Serve %
60% (4622/7713)
55% (808/1460)
1st Serve Win %
59% (2733/4622)
41% (227/547)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (1272/3091)
50% (114/227)
Break Points Won % (Total)
51% (514/1015)
46% (884/1932)
Return Points Win %
48% (3586/7440)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
21% (3/11)
Challenger W/L
56% (29/23)
68% (21/10)
Futures W/L
64% (47/26)
55% (24/44)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
60% (75/126)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
73% (8/11)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
65% (17/26)
56% (9/16)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (20/36)
88% (24/21)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (79/68)
13% (24/3)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (79/11)
14% (21/3)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
16% (49/8)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
