M. Kostyuk
To Win
S. Bejlek
To Win
Rebeka Masarova vs Sara Bejlek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W W L
Form
L L W L W L L W W WH2H: Masarova 2 - 0 Bejlek
They have played 6 sets in total, with Masarova winning 4 and Bejlek winning 2. The last match between Masarova and Bejlek was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 22-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Rebeka Masarova getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rebeka Masarova | 2 |
| Sara Bejlek | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(22-04-2025)
Rebeka Masarova
Sara Bejlek
6
2
5
7
6
2
| Masarova | Stats | Bejlek |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (21-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (15-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 124 | Ranking | 193 |
| 62 | Highest Rank | 114 |
| 25 | Age | 19 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 8 |
| 63% (252-148) | Career Total W/L | 67% (134-67) |
| $890,343 | Career Prize Money | $624,721 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Carle VS Li PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Lehecka VS Thompson PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 5-7 6-2 |
Stats 
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Sara Bejlek
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
82%
(
79 of
96)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Sara Bejlek
62%
(
77 of
125)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
113)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
46 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
125
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 36 | Games Won | 28 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:17:38 | Average Match Time | 2:17:38 |
| 59% (122/207) | 1st Serve % | 75% (156/209) |
| 70% (85/122) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (91/156) |
| 48% (41/85) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (24/53) |
| 62% (13/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (9/19) |
| 45% (94/209) | Return Points Win % | 39% (81/207) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Masarova vs Bejlek Match Preview :
When evaluating the second serve performance over the past six months, Masarova has demonstrated an ability to secure 39.91% of points, which slightly edges out Bejlek, who has managed to win 38.04% of such points. This particular statistic is often utilized for predicting match outcomes due to its high correlation with performance.
In terms of return game statistics, the recent form indicates that Masarova has won 48.77% of her opponents' second-serve points compared to Bejlek's 48.02%. However, Bejlek has a stronger performance on first serve returns, recording 35.85% against Masarova's 29.43%. These figures carry significant weight in forecasting who might be favored in their head-to-head matchup.
Breaking down performances under pressure, Masarova has saved 51.55% of breakpoints recently, surpassing Bejlek who has saved 47.43%. This statistic is particularly relevant for in-game betting predictions, providing insight into how each player might handle crucial moments during the match.
An analysis of their performance over the last year reveals that Masarova has won 49.06% of her matches with a win-loss record of 26/27, whereas Bejlek has been more successful, claiming victory in 65.96% of her encounters, with a record of 31/16. These figures suggest a slight edge for Bejlek when assessing overall head-to-head predictions.
Looking at career surface preference, Masarova excels on clay, boasting a 66% win rate (134/69), while her performance on grass drops to 38% (5/8). Bejlek also favors clay with a 71% win rate (104/43) but struggles more on grass, securing only 20% (1/4) of her matches. This shared preference for clay could impact their performance depending on the surface they're contesting.
The players' experience and success in tournaments reveal that Masarova, over the past year, has mostly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of her matches (9/8). Bejlek, competing at the same level, has been more effective with a win rate of 67.86% (19/9). This context is crucial when considering how they might perform against each other.
In direct head-to-head encounters, Masarova has a slight advantage, having claimed victory in their only meeting thus far. This match was played on grass during the Berlin Ladies Open, where Masarova emerged victorious in a tightly contested battle, winning 6-7(4), 6-4, 7-6(3). Notably, their matches have typically been prolonged, averaging 2 hours and 35 minutes.
Given their past encounters, Masarova and Bejlek have played three sets once, with Masarova winning this one as well. Both players have split the tiebreakers they have contested, highlighting the competitiveness between them. If the match goes into a deciding set, Masarova wins 48% of those played in the past year, while Bejlek has a slightly better rate, winning 60%.
The quality of opponents faced over the last 12 months is another factor, with Masarova encountering players averaging a rank of 154.15, while Bejlek faced players ranked around 194.68. This might suggest a more challenging competition for Masarova during this period.
Finally, considering their recent breakpoint conversion statistics, Masarova has converted 31.25% of opportunities, while Bejlek has capitalized on 44.83% of chances. This suggests Bejlek might have an advantage when it comes to seizing critical moments. Taking all these factors into account, although both players demonstrate strengths, the statistics lean toward Bejlek being the likely victor in this upcoming match.
Masarova vs Bejlek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Rebeka Masarova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Rebeka Masarova
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Carson Branstine
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Lina Glushko
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Rebeka Masarova
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
46%
(
38 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Katerina Siniakova
49%
(
40 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Renata Zarazua
50%
(
51 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
8
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Arantxa Rus
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
5
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sara Bejlek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
81 of
125)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
58 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Mona Barthel
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
19 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Sara Bejlek
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
82%
(
50 of
61)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Sara Bejlek
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
82%
(
79 of
96)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Anna Bondar
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Sara Bejlek
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
48%
(
19 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
35
|
4-6 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Petra Martic
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (252/148) | Win/Loss | 67% (134/67) |
| 60% (564/370) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (286/175) |
| 54% (4675/3958) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2318/1911) |
| 63% (82/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (26/18) |
| 67% (143/72) | Clay Win/Loss | 70% (107/45) |
| 52% (22/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (5/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 1335 | Aces Total | 75 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1404 | Total Double Faults | 526 |
| 1:30:17 | Average Match Time | 1:34:28 |
| 373.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 325.14 |
| 62% (16146/25939) | 1st Serve % | 72% (9734/13506) |
| 66% (10632/16146) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (5622/9734) |
| 46% (4493/9793) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1763/3772) |
| 47% (1398/2977) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (956/1858) |
| 44% (11317/25433) | Return Points Win % | 49% (6571/13387) |
| 50% (15/15) | Slam W/L | 64% (18/10) |
| 51% (20/19) | Masters W/L | 70% (7/3) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (37/30) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (6/6) |
| 64% (114/63) | Challenger W/L | 68% (99/46) |
| 76% (65/20) | Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 63% (245/389) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (131/197) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 64% (65/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (27/44) |
| 53% (76/143) | Deciding Set Win % | 68% (40/59) |
| 83% (248/206) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (122/112) |
| 17% (248/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (122/9) |
| 30% (152/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (79/22) |
Masarova vs. Bejlek Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
