Rebeka Masarova vs Maddison Inglis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W W L
Form
W W L W W L L L W LH2H: Masarova 1 - 0 Inglis
They have played 3 sets in total, with Masarova winning 2 and Inglis winning 1. The last match between Masarova and Inglis was at the Puerto Vallarta Open - Puerto Vallarta, 29-03-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Rebeka Masarova getting the victory 6-1 2-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rebeka Masarova | 1 |
| Maddison Inglis | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Puerto Vallarta Open - Puerto Vallarta(29-03-2025)
Rebeka Masarova
Maddison Inglis
6
1
2
6
6
2
| Masarova | Stats | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (21-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (18-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 124 | Ranking | 155 |
| 62 | Highest Rank | 112 |
| 25 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 9 |
| 63% (252-148) | Career Total W/L | 60% (296-201) |
| $890,343 | Career Prize Money | $460,080 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Galan PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Bencic PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 2-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 9 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:35:5 | Average Match Time | 1:35:5 |
| 66% (48/73) | 1st Serve % | 52% (33/63) |
| 75% (36/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (24/33) |
| 44% (11/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 41% (26/63) | Return Points Win % | 36% (26/73) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rebeka Masarova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Rebeka Masarova
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Carson Branstine
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Lina Glushko
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Rebeka Masarova
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
46%
(
38 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Katerina Siniakova
49%
(
40 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Renata Zarazua
50%
(
51 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
8
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Arantxa Rus
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
5
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Maddison Inglis
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Maddison Inglis
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Hayu Kinoshita
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (252/148) | Win/Loss | 60% (296/201) |
| 60% (564/370) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (663/477) |
| 54% (4675/3958) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5513/4826) |
| 63% (82/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (237/148) |
| 67% (143/72) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (22/25) |
| 52% (22/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 38% (5/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 61% (33/21) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1335 | Aces Total | 755 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1404 | Total Double Faults | 1330 |
| 1:30:17 | Average Match Time | 1:28:6 |
| 373.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 442.33 |
| 62% (16146/25939) | 1st Serve % | 65% (18391/28139) |
| 66% (10632/16146) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (11513/18391) |
| 46% (4493/9793) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4547/9748) |
| 47% (1398/2977) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1695/3537) |
| 44% (11317/25433) | Return Points Win % | 45% (13130/29113) |
| 50% (15/15) | Slam W/L | 45% (17/21) |
| 51% (20/19) | Masters W/L | 27% (3/8) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (37/30) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (18/27) |
| 64% (114/63) | Challenger W/L | 64% (251/143) |
| 76% (65/20) | Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) |
| 63% (245/389) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (292/486) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 64% (65/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (62/95) |
| 53% (76/143) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (80/153) |
| 83% (248/206) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (293/250) |
| 17% (248/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (293/43) |
| 30% (152/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (204/46) |
Masarova vs. Inglis Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
