M. Sakkari
To Win
J. Paolini
To Win
Rebecca Sramkova vs Jasmine Paolini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L W L L
Form
W W W W L W W W L WHead To Head: Sramkova 4 - 4 Paolini
They have played 18 sets in total, with Sramkova winning 8 and Paolini winning 10. The last match between Sramkova and Paolini was at the Miami Open - Miami, 20-03-2025, Second, Hard with Jasmine Paolini getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rebecca Sramkova | 4 |
| Jasmine Paolini | 4 |
Miami Open - Miami(20-03-2025)
6
4
6
4
| Sramkova | Stats | Paolini |
|---|---|---|
| 40% (8-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (16-7) |
| 4 | Head-to-Head | 4 |
| 38 | Ranking | 6 |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 4 |
| 28 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 13 |
| 61% (424-270) | Career Total W/L | 59% (414-285) |
| $1,109,849 | Career Prize Money | $6,161,875 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 3 | Clay H2H | 2 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
61%
(
69 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
41%
(
46 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 6-1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
45%
(
34 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches | 4 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 10 |
| 79 | Games Won | 87 |
| 38 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 25 | Total Double Faults | 22 |
| 1:29:44 | Average Match Time | 1:29:44 |
| 58% (333/571) | 1st Serve % | 61% (324/532) |
| 60% (200/333) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (198/324) |
| 47% (112/238) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (92/208) |
| 43% (29/68) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (34/81) |
| 45% (242/532) | Return Points Win % | 45% (259/571) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (5/4) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (5/1) |
| 20% (5/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rebecca Sramkova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Johanne Svendsen
61%
(
73 of
119)
1st Serve %
109%
(
60 of
55)
9
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
46 of
77)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
123)
127
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Lulu Sun
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jasmine Paolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Katie Boulter
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Jasmine Paolini
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Cori Gauff
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Eva Lys
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Jasmine Paolini
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Magda Linette
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Naomi Osaka
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
75%
(
12 of
16)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
43%
(
12 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
22
Total Points Won
22
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (424/270) | Win/Loss | 59% (414/285) |
| 59% (947/661) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (916/723) |
| 53% (8021/7008) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7828/7159) |
| 55% (78/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (139/103) |
| 64% (238/131) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (217/125) |
| 60% (97/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (44/42) |
| 55% (11/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (14/15) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1576 | Aces Total | 517 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1424 | Total Double Faults | 1271 |
| 1:9:55 | Average Match Time | 1:14:22 |
| 426.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.41 |
| 58% (20196/34859) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25302/38943) |
| 64% (13004/20196) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (15077/25302) |
| 47% (6833/14663) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (6383/13637) |
| 45% (1962/4315) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2304/4775) |
| 45% (15506/34608) | Return Points Win % | 46% (17324/37813) |
| 51% (27/26) | Slam W/L | 49% (31/32) |
| 59% (17/12) | Masters W/L | 54% (44/38) |
| 50% (6/6) | Cups W/L | 50% (8/8) |
| 48% (34/37) | Main Tour W/L | 55% (103/84) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (259/160) | Challenger W/L | 64% (177/98) |
| 74% (81/29) | Futures W/L | 67% (51/25) |
| 61% (416/684) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (404/689) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 57% (93/163) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (74/137) |
| 54% (120/222) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (150/249) |
| 86% (419/362) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (374/322) |
| 14% (419/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (374/51) |
| 22% (275/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (324/87) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
