Rebecca Sramkova vs Clara Tauson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L L W L
Form
L W L W L L L W W LH2H: Sramkova 1 - 3 Tauson
They have played 7 sets in total, with Sramkova winning 1 and Tauson winning 6. The last match between Sramkova and Tauson was at the Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai, 17-02-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Clara Tauson getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rebecca Sramkova | 1 |
| Clara Tauson | 3 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai(17-02-2025)
Clara Tauson
Rebecca Sramkova
7
6
6
0
| Sramkova | Stats | Tauson |
|---|---|---|
| 41% (9-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (19-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 3 |
| 41 | Ranking | 23 |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 21 |
| 28 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 15 |
| 61% (425-271) | Career Total W/L | 69% (252-115) |
| $1,131,064 | Career Prize Money | $2,619,945 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alcaraz VS Musetti PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
15 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 6-0 |
Stats 
Clara Tauson
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 7-6(6) ret. |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Clara Tauson
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
51%
(
21 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
47
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
46%
(
22 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 3 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 22 | Games Won | 43 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 16 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:14:8 | Average Match Time | 1:14:8 |
| 52% (117/226) | 1st Serve % | 56% (107/191) |
| 65% (76/117) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (79/107) |
| 35% (38/109) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (54/84) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (15/28) |
| 30% (58/191) | Return Points Win % | 50% (112/226) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (3/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sramkova vs Tauson Match Preview :
- Recent Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Tauson has exhibited a success rate of 46.02% on their second serve, while Sramkova has achieved a slightly higher success rate of 48.37%. The correlation between this statistical measure and accurate match predictions should not be overlooked.
- Return Game Statistics: In recent matches, Tauson has displayed an impressive ability to win 55.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sramkova has achieved a similar success rate of 55.6%. The first serve return statistics are also worth analyzing: Tauson has achieved a rate of 36.96% while Sramkova has garnered a rate of 37.32%. These figures hold a significant correlation to determine the favored contender in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Examining recent performances, Tauson has successfully saved 58.48% of breakpoints while Sramkova has managed to save 56.23%. Analyzing this statistical metric can prove useful in making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Looking at the overall performance in the past year, Tauson boasts a 60.61% win rate (W/L 40/26), whereas Sramkova has an even more commendable 62.86% win rate (W/L 44/26). These figures provide us with a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head encounter.
- Optimal Surface: Tauson exhibits their most triumphant career surface on indoor hard courts, attaining a remarkable 76% win rate (W/L 78/25). Conversely, their weakest performance is observed on grass, with a mere 22% win rate (W/L 2/7). On the other hand, Sramkova flourishes on clay with a 65% career win rate (W/L 238/130), but faces challenges on indoor hard courts, achieving a 55% win rate (W/L 70/57).
- Player Level: Within the last year, Tauson has primarily competed on the main tour, emerging victorious in 56.52% of matches (W/L 13/10). Conversely, Sramkova has also primarily engaged in main tour matches and achieved an impressive 65.38% win rate (W/L 17/9). When comparing these statistics to predict the favored player, it is essential to consider the level of events they have been participating in.
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches: Prior encounters between these players have taken place three times. Tauson emerged victorious in two of these matchups, while Sramkova has yet to secure a triumph. Across five sets played, Tauson holds a four-to-one set advantage over Sramkova. Notably, their most recent confrontation occurred at the Mutua Madrid Open in Madrid on April 22, 2024, during the qualification round on clay. Rebecca Sramkova emerged as the victor with a 7-6(6) result due to Tauson's retirement.
- Head-to-Head Match Duration: During their previous encounters, the average match duration between these players was 1 hour, 8 minutes, and 58 seconds.
- Prediction for Deciding Set: Tauson and Sramkova have not yet engaged in a deciding set, rendering their head-to-head statistics in this aspect inconclusive.
- Head-to-Head in Extreme Pressure Situations: Out of their matches, they have reached one tiebreaker, with Tauson failing to secure a victory while Sramkova triumphed.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past year, Tauson has faced opponents with an average ranking of 111.73, whereas Sramkova has competed against players boasting an average ranking of 126.97.
- Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: Notably, Tauson has secured victory in 45% of deciding sets played within the past twelve months, while Sramkova has demonstrated an impressive 67% success rate in overall tour matches. These figures can serve as valuable indicators when live predictions and betting are of interest.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Although past player performances hold significance in predicting tennis matches, it is imperative to also examine current event statistics to gauge the form of each player. For further insights, please refer to the relevant section below (applicable if either player has participated in the current event). Additionally, certain players exhibit superior performances at specific events, thus necessitating consideration when determining the anticipated outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: Assessing recent form, Tauson has converted 46.07% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Sramkova has capitalized on 47.6% of their chances to break opponents' serves. This statistic carries significance for in-game live betting tips whenever either player possesses a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that accurately predict the outcome of tennis matches, this article provides a thorough starting point. Please note that the content is tailored for enthusiasts well-versed in statistics.
Sramkova vs Tauson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Rebecca Sramkova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Mccartney Kessler
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Johanne Svendsen
61%
(
73 of
119)
1st Serve %
109%
(
60 of
55)
9
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
46 of
77)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
123)
127
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Clara Tauson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Clara Tauson
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Emma Navarro
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Katie Volynets
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Clara Tauson
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Clara Tauson
51%
(
47 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
116)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
116)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Clara Tauson
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Julia Grabher
48%
(
30 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Clara Tauson
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (425/271) | Win/Loss | 69% (252/115) |
| 59% (950/663) | Sets Win/Loss | 66% (547/279) |
| 53% (8046/7027) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (4309/3311) |
| 55% (78/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (95/50) |
| 64% (239/132) | Clay Win/Loss | 68% (68/32) |
| 60% (97/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 77% (87/26) |
| 55% (11/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1578 | Aces Total | 1346 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1429 | Total Double Faults | 1149 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:35:38 |
| 193.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 275.63 |
| 58% (20281/35001) | 1st Serve % | 60% (14222/23769) |
| 64% (13059/20281) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9610/14222) |
| 47% (6857/14720) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4623/9546) |
| 45% (1973/4338) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1439/3079) |
| 45% (15579/34756) | Return Points Win % | 46% (11145/24447) |
| 51% (27/26) | Slam W/L | 59% (23/16) |
| 58% (18/13) | Masters W/L | 50% (19/19) |
| 50% (6/6) | Cups W/L | 77% (10/3) |
| 48% (34/37) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (51/35) |
| 62% (259/160) | Challenger W/L | 75% (110/36) |
| 74% (81/29) | Futures W/L | 87% (39/6) |
| 61% (417/686) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 70% (248/354) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 57% (93/163) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (52/96) |
| 54% (120/223) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (53/99) |
| 86% (421/363) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (255/228) |
| 14% (421/58) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (255/26) |
| 22% (275/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (112/22) |
Sramkova vs. Tauson Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
