Raymond Sarmiento vs Dane Propoggia Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sarmiento vs Propoggia analysis and find out who is favored!
Raymond Sarmiento vs Dane Propoggia Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sarmiento has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Propoggia has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sarmiento, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Propoggia has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sarmiento has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Propoggia has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sarmiento has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Propoggia winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sarmiento has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 48/ 23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Propoggia has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 9/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sarmiento winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sarmiento winning 2 and Propoggia winning 0. The last match between Sarmiento and Propoggia was at the Singapore F2 (Singapore), 01-06-2017, Second, Hard with Raymond Sarmiento getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sarmiento and Propoggia have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sarmiento winning 0 times and Propoggia 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sarmiento winning 1, and Propoggia 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sarmiento has played against opponents with an average rank of while Propoggia has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sarmiento has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Propoggia has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sarmiento has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Propoggia has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sarmiento 1 - 0 Propoggia
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
882
Rank
287
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
295
High
33
Age
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
59% (169-117)
Career Total W/L
56% (235-182)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$30,950
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Raymond Sarmiento | Dane Propoggia |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:0 | 1:38:0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (39/60) | 64% (49/77) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (28/39) | 61% (30/49) |
2nd Serve Win% | 67% (14/21) | 46% (13/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 100% (1/1) |
Return Points W% | 44% (34/77) | 30% (18/60) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 6-2 |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Dane Propoggia
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Raymond Sarmiento | Dane Propoggia |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Raymond Sarmiento Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Gabriel Diallo
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Alexander Brown
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Sebastian Gima
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Shunsuke Mitsui
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
99)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Yankel Zemel
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
11
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(0) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexander Sarkissian
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 7-6(3) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-5 3-6 9-8 | H2H |
view more
Dane Propoggia Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Karlo Kranic
Player
Dane Propoggia
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fran Zvonimir Zgombic
Player
Dane Propoggia
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
12
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomislav Jotovski
Player
Dane Propoggia
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Harry Bourchier
Player
Dane Propoggia
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dayne Kelly
Player
Dane Propoggia
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dane Propoggia
Player
Thomas Fancutt
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
6
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Dane Propoggia
Player
Alexander Babanine
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Liam Caruana
Player
Dane Propoggia
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Dane Propoggia
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H |
view more