Raul Brancaccio vs Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Jul at 09:27 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Brancaccio vs S. Gueymard Wayenburg

ITA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Brancaccio 0 - 1 Wayenburg
They have played 3 sets in total, with Raul Brancaccio winning 1 and Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg winning 2. The last match between Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg and Raul Brancaccio was at the Liberec Challenger, 29-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg getting the victory 6-2 2-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brancaccio | 0 |
| Wayenburg | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Liberec Challenger(07-29-25)
R. Brancaccio vs S. G. Wayenburg H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $119,520 | Career Prize Money | $80,200 |
| 57.36% (382-284) | Career Total W/L | 55.29% (162-131) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 9 | Titles | 5 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Brancaccio vs S. G. Wayenburg Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Brancaccio has recently secured 45.84% of points on their second serve, slightly outperforming Wayenburg's 42.88%. Could this slight edge influence the match outcome?
- Return Game Stats: Wayenburg leads in recent form for second serve returns, winning 47.99% of points compared to Brancaccio's 46.47%. They also edge out in first serve returns, capturing 28.18% to Brancaccio's 27.01%. Will this give Wayenburg an advantage?
- Under Pressure Analysis: Brancaccio saves 52.02% of breakpoints recently, slightly higher than Wayenburg's 49.01%. Is Brancaccio more capable of handling high-pressure scenarios?
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Brancaccio has a slightly better win rate of 56.06% compared to Wayenburg's 50%. Does this consistency signify a stronger form?
- Best Surface: Both players perform best on hard surfaces with a win rate of 61%, but Brancaccio and Wayenburg show weaknesses on grass. Will the surface impact their performances in this match?
- Player Level: Brancaccio has a slight advantage, winning 52.5% of matches at Challengers/ITF events compared to Wayenburg's 47.17%. Could this edge in event-level matches forecast a win?
- Opponent Quality: Wayenburg competes against higher-ranked players on average (349.25), unlike Brancaccio, whose opponents average 414.61. Does this mean Wayenburg is better prepared for tougher foes?
- Deciding Set Performance: If the match extends to a deciding set, Wayenburg boasts a 52% win rate versus Brancaccio's 38%. Could this determine the victor in a close match?
- Break Point Conversion: Wayenburg converts 36.6% of breakpoints while Brancaccio manages 31.22%. Does Wayenburg's stronger breakpoint efficiency present a significant advantage?
Editorial Prediction (July 29, 2025, UTC):
As Brancaccio and Wayenburg prepare for their upcoming match, both players showcase distinct strengths that could tip the scales in their favor. Brancaccio demonstrates a better recent form on second serve performance and breakpoint protection, indicating a potentially stronger showing under pressure.
Conversely, Wayenburg excels in return games and breakpoint conversion, which could disrupt Brancaccio's rhythm and offer key opportunities during pivotal moments. Their competitive experience against higher-ranked opponents suggests a readiness for formidable competition.
Considering these factors, the match promises to be closely contested. However, Wayenburg's proven ability in crucial segments of play — particularly in deciding sets and breakpoint scenarios — positions them as the likely winner of this confrontation.
Raul Brancaccio vs Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Brancaccio vs S. G. Wayenburg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 11 | Games Won | 14 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:39:34 | Average Match Time | 1:39:34 |
| 58% (48/83) | 1st Serve % | 63% (48/76) |
| 58% (28/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (29/48) |
| 34% (12/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (10/28) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Pts Won % | 54% (7/13) |
| 49% (37/76) | Return Points Win % | 52% (43/83) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Brancaccio Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 3-6 4-1 ret. | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
S. G. Wayenburg Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 1-6 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||

R. Brancaccio vs S. G. Wayenburg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.36% (382/284) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.29% (162/131) |
| 56.87% (869/659) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.04% (377/308) |
| 53.37% (7451/6510) | Games Win/Loss | 52.22% (3403/3114) |
| 60.95% (64/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.85% (42/36) |
| 58.27% (289/207) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.33% (40/35) |
| 45.16% (28/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.09% (79/57) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.58 |
| 1109 | Aces Total | 1833 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 1886 | Total Double Faults | 1316 |
| 1:24:34 | Average Match Time | 1:38:36 |
| 478.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 441.8 |
| 62% (24647/39784) | 1st Serve % | 57% (11732/20655) |
| 66% (16169/24647) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (8511/11732) |
| 48% (7288/15137) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4260/8923) |
| 45% (2103/4626) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (908/2132) |
| 43% (17608/40756) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8512/20995) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Slam W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 30.77% (4/9) | Main Tour W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 50.34% (146/144) | Challenger W/L | 44.09% (41/52) |
| 65.04% (227/122) | Futures W/L | 63.10% (118/69) |
| 57% (374/654) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (161/292) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (90/166) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (45/93) |
| 45% (89/196) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (46/100) |
| 87% (384/334) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (168/141) |
| 13% (384/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (168/27) |
| 17% (282/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (125/21) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Panna Udvardy vs Diletta Cherubini Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

Alycia Parks vs Gabriela Andrea Knutson Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

Martina Colmegna vs Oleksandra Oliynykova Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

Tatjana Maria vs Irene Burillo Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

Dalma Galfi vs Tereza Martincova Prediction – WTA W100 Dubai – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets
