Rasheeda Mcadoo vs Sophia Ksandinov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Jul at 12:32 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Mcadoo vs S. Ksandinov

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mcadoo 2 - 0 Ksandinov
They have played 4 sets in total, with Rasheeda Mcadoo winning 4 and Sophia Ksandinov winning 0. The last match between Rasheeda Mcadoo and Sophia Ksandinov was at the W50 Aschaffenburg, 08-07-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Rasheeda Mcadoo getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mcadoo | 2 |
| Ksandinov | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W50 Aschaffenburg(07-08-25)
(Q1) W35 Stuttgart-Vaihingen(06-30-25)
R. Mcadoo vs S. Ksandinov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.39% (197-179) | Career Total W/L | 46.67% (28-32) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Mcadoo vs S. Ksandinov Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Mcadoo with a significant advantage, winning 42.66% of points compared to Ksandinov's 32.26%. Is second serve performance a strong indicator of match outcomes? Yes, it often correlates highly with match prediction accuracy.
- Ksandinov demonstrates stronger return game abilities, winning 56.25% of opponents' second serve points versus Mcadoo's 49.27%. Additionally, Ksandinov outperforms on first serve returns at 40.89%, notably higher than Mcadoo's 28.73%.
- Under pressure, Mcadoo appears more resilient, saving 53.77% of breakpoints compared to Ksandinov's 47.31%, a crucial factor in in-game predictions.
- In a broader performance context, Mcadoo surpasses Ksandinov in match outcomes over the past year with a win rate of 58.18% versus 43.48%.
- Both players excel on clay surfaces, though Mcadoo holds a marginal edge with a 54% win rate over Ksandinov's 51%, suggesting slight favorability on this surface.
- Despite Ksandinov's stronger breakpoint conversion rate at 49.06%, Mcadoo's overall competitive track record in higher-tier tournaments may provide an advantage.
- In their singular head-to-head encounter, Mcadoo secured both sets comfortably, highlighting past dominance.
- Although Ksandinov has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, Mcadoo's impressive 67% win rate in deciding sets suggests greater tenacity in longer matches.
Editorial Prediction (July 8, 2025, UTC):
In reviewing the statistical comparison of Ksandinov and Mcadoo, several key indicators favor Mcadoo as the likely winner of the upcoming match. Mcadoo's superior performance on second serves, coupled with a more impressive breakpoint saving rate, positions them as a formidable opponent.
Despite Ksandinov's better breakpoint conversion and return capabilities, Mcadoo's historical track record, including past head-to-head victories and higher success in deciding sets, underscores their consistency in competitive settings.
Considering these factors, Rasheeda Mcadoo is poised as the probable victor in this forthcoming encounter, leveraging their experience and resilience to secure another win against Ksandinov.
Rasheeda Mcadoo vs Sophia Ksandinov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Mcadoo vs S. Ksandinov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 9 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:50:35 | Average Match Time | 0:50:35 |
| 60% (33/55) | 1st Serve % | 67% (38/57) |
| 73% (24/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (22/38) |
| 59% (13/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (6/19) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (29/57) | Return Points Win % | 33% (18/55) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Mcadoo Recent Matches Played
S. Ksandinov Recent Matches Played

R. Mcadoo vs S. Ksandinov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.39% (197/179) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.67% (28/32) |
| 52.45% (450/408) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.74% (59/70) |
| 52.08% (4135/3804) | Games Win/Loss | 48.90% (557/582) |
| 50.64% (79/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (8/12) |
| 54.44% (98/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (20/20) |
| 50.00% (20/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 1005 | Aces Total | 5 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 957 | Total Double Faults | 133 |
| 1:24:27 | Average Match Time | 1:4:1 |
| 468.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 267.07 |
| 55% (10721/19438) | 1st Serve % | 65% (1449/2246) |
| 65% (6978/10721) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (750/1449) |
| 47% (4085/8716) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (311/797) |
| 47% (991/2100) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (144/287) |
| 44% (8197/18775) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1041/2224) |
| 52.25% (174/159) | Challenger W/L | 42.86% (9/12) |
| 53.49% (23/20) | Futures W/L | 48.72% (19/20) |
| 52% (192/369) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (27/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (33/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 46% (51/111) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (6/10) |
| 82% (207/170) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (29/26) |
| 17% (207/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (29/3) |
| 16% (169/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (31/2) |